This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] [3/n] Fix minor SSA_NAME leaks
- From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 09:15:24 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [3/n] Fix minor SSA_NAME leaks
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5616D66A dot 7010906 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc0w7W_yGFGzi8vAbcXih9CniAAj1sK4hB0VEREn-DjS_A at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 10/09/2015 03:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
And other minor leak. This time in tree-stdarg. Unlike other cases, we're
dropping just the virtual definition, other definitions on the statement
need to be preserved (they're going to be re-used). Additionally, this one
is missing the call to unlink_stmt_vdef.
Like other cases, I've got a minimized test, but no good way to add it to
the testsuite right now.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. Installed on the
trunk.
Jeff
commit 4d303443cc66bf32f3f045014dd22f0e475f0d50
Author: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Oct 8 14:46:03 2015 -0600
[PATCH] [3/n] Fix minor SSA_NAME leaks
* tree-stdarg.c (expand_ifn_va_arg_1): Add missing call to
unlink_stmt_vdef and release_ssa_name_fn.
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 64309c1..31e2f30 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
2015-10-08 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
+ * tree-stdarg.c (expand_ifn_va_arg_1): Add missing call to
+ unlink_stmt_vdef and release_ssa_name_fn.
+
* tree-ssa-dse.c (dse_optimize_stmt): Add missing call to
release_defs.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-stdarg.c b/gcc/tree-stdarg.c
index d69fa06..3e6d98c 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-stdarg.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-stdarg.c
@@ -1080,6 +1080,8 @@ expand_ifn_va_arg_1 (function *fun)
/* Remove the IFN_VA_ARG gimple_call. It's the last stmt in the
bb. */
+ unlink_stmt_vdef (stmt);
+ release_ssa_name_fn (fun, gimple_vdef (stmt));
I'd prefer a release_defs () call here, it works well in combination with
unlink_stmt_vdef.
I would too, but the LHS of the original call is re-used in the lowered
statements. See :
lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
if (lhs != NULL_TREE)
{
unsigned int nargs = gimple_call_num_args (stmt);
gcc_assert (useless_type_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (lhs), type));
if (nargs == 3)
{
/* We've transported the size of with WITH_SIZE_EXPR
here as
the last argument of the internal fn call. Now
reinstate
it. */
tree size = gimple_call_arg (stmt, nargs - 1);
expr = build2 (WITH_SIZE_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (expr), expr,
size);
}
/* We use gimplify_assign here, rather than
gimple_build_assign,
because gimple_assign knows how to deal with variable-sized
types. */
gimplify_assign (lhs, expr, &pre);
}
My first preference is always to release everything. If I'm not doing
so it's because of something like this.
jeff