This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] F2008 - implement pointer function assignment

From: Mikael Morin <mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr>
To: FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
Cc: "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:40:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] F2008 - implement pointer function assignment
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Authentication-results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header dot from=mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr
References: <CAGkQGiKErpkGU_nSZH1Z1s9SCekBWWSGTpOiKRXaA8PytjK=4g at mail dot gmail dot com> <B33324B9-1F57-4ACD-ADAA-BED55DB2344B at gmail dot com>

Le 27/08/2015 16:54, FX a Ãcrit :

I think it shouldnât be too hard to get the ambiguity lifted. We already can do it for array assignment vs. statement functions, so maybe we could get a hint from that?

Well, for array assignments, the array is declared before, whereas forpointer functions, the declaration can come after (contained functions).That's an important difference, I think.


Mikael

References:
- [Patch, fortran] F2008 - implement pointer function assignment
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] F2008 - implement pointer function assignment
  - From: FX

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]