This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- Cc: Patrick Marlier <patrick dot marlier at gmail dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, James Greenhalgh <james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 06:50:07 -0300
- Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <orio9cw10j dot fsf at livre dot home> <CAFiYyc3k9xh_6RGbTdHYOJ-aEmUWVeFRoWy=YzCHFDNSdtTXCA at mail dot gmail dot com> <orwpxqvqnp dot fsf at livre dot home> <20150723203112 dot GB27818 at gate dot crashing dot org> <CAMe9rOpR+2gPxo0tKaRPtcML_Q4=r-_=9iqk+_JZFPkM=eN=BQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOpbLEyDexVJqJAFJ3W6o4AktNog-jwk2CY4GZkrmT+nfA at mail dot gmail dot com> <or4mkmhgc9 dot fsf at livre dot home> <CAMe9rOp=S5fu1N=i7waswCYqJeLBCrySqYdFYkVa7LV04vpQSg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOrq+ZBAg1nZ1twEcPqwBj4j9+XA+SXQJVWWzjfdvidjtw at mail dot gmail dot com> <or1tfkdjhj dot fsf at livre dot home> <20150810082355 dot GA31149 at arm dot com> <55C8BFC3 dot 3030603 at redhat dot com> <CAKQMxzRzMrGtf921vqXCno5uoBN+uzsnJ5wX2Twmvhp1ziAEcA at mail dot gmail dot com> <or37zlpujd dot fsf at livre dot home> <m2lhdd3pbe dot fsf at linux-m68k dot org>
On Aug 15, 2015, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_1.c (internal compiler error)
> In file included from
> /opt/gcc/gcc-20150815/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_crypto_ice_1.c:4:0:
Are you sure this is a regression introduced by my patch? The comments
at the top of this file seem to indicate it is a known problem in the
expansion of the crypto builtin, which is precisely what we see in the
backtrace?
If it is indeed a regression, would you please provide me with a
preprocessed testcase so that I can look into it without a native
environment?
Thanks in advance,
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer