This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 11/08/15 18:05, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/09/2015 03:20 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:So there's a tight relationship between the implementation of bbs_ok_for_cmove_arith and insn_valid_noce_process_p. If there wasn't, then we'd probably be looking to use note_stores and note_uses.Perhaps I'm missing something, but what is wrong with using DF here instead of note_stores/note_uses? All the info on refs/mods of registers is available in the DF caches.Nothing inherently wrong with using DF here.
I have reworked the patch to use FOR_EACH_INSN_DEF and FOR_EACH_INSN_USE in bbs_ok_for_cmove_arith to extracts the refs/mods and it seems to work. Is that what you mean by DF? I'm doing some more testing and hope to post the updated version soon. Thanks, Kyrill
jeff
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |