This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[committed] Add todo comment for move_sese_region_to_fn


[ was: Re: [committed, gomp4] Fix release_dangling_ssa_names ]
On 05/08/15 13:13, Richard Biener wrote:
I think that the whole dance of actually moving things instead of
> >just copying it isn't worth the extra maintainance (well, if we already
> >have a machinery duplicating a SESE region to another function - I
> >suppose gimple_duplicate_sese_region could be trivially changed to
> >support that).
> >
>
>I'll mention that as todo. For now, I think the fastest way to get a working
>version is to fix move_sese_region_to_fn.
Sure.


This patch adds the todo discussed above in the function header comment of move_sese_region_to_fn.

Committed as obvious.

Thanks,
- Tom
Add todo comment for move_sese_region_to_fn

2015-08-11  Tom de Vries  <tom@codesourcery.com>

	* tree-cfg.c (move_sese_region_to_fn): Add todo comment.
---
 gcc/tree-cfg.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.c b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
index e26454a..588ab69 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
@@ -7011,7 +7011,11 @@ verify_sese (basic_block entry, basic_block exit, vec<basic_block> *bbs_p)
 
    All local variables referenced in the region are assumed to be in
    the corresponding BLOCK_VARS and unexpanded variable lists
-   associated with DEST_CFUN.  */
+   associated with DEST_CFUN.
+
+   TODO: investigate whether we can reuse gimple_duplicate_sese_region to
+   reimplement move_sese_region_to_fn by duplicating the region rather than
+   moving it.  */
 
 basic_block
 move_sese_region_to_fn (struct function *dest_cfun, basic_block entry_bb,
-- 
1.9.1


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]