This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 4/4] define ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL to the name of a function
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde at tbsaunde dot org>, tbsaunde+gcc at tbsaunde dot org, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:28:27 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] define ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL to the name of a function
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1437791820-17927-1-git-send-email-tbsaunde+gcc at tbsaunde dot org> <1437791820-17927-5-git-send-email-tbsaunde+gcc at tbsaunde dot org> <CAFiYyc2eP1e=yBUVwVQbCRHn1jsB3oE3b8exV6qfEYZm9F9WVQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150805105650 dot GA27755 at tsaunders-iceball dot corp dot tor1 dot mozilla dot com> <CAFiYyc0UQXp=X__=gynjd7ibBOOebAapJzvyeP+mUEn7Nc3XhA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150805133617 dot GA1299 at tsaunders-iceball dot corp dot tor1 dot mozilla dot com> <CAFiYyc0yag_yYCBEjjQ3F7AFKnc4ndM25og8waTCoRa8AixR6w at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:59:18PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> Makes it quite unparsable to editors of course ...
> >
> > The idea of having .S files that aren't reasonably editable seems kind
> > of silly, but I guess its up to the gas people.
>
> Heh, indeed. Maybe instead do
>
> .insert_from_file <filename>
>
> and do that only when we are using -pipe or so.
That's ".incbin". Do we really want to go through the headaches of using
extra files though? Is this really a bottleneck? Will it even help?
Segher