This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Bug fortran/52846] [F2008] Support submodules - part 3/3
- From: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
- To: FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>, Damian Rouson <damian at sourceryinstitute dot org>, Mikael Morin <mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr>, "Bader, Reinhold" <Reinhold dot Bader at lrz dot de>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "salvatore dot filippone at uniroma2 dot it" <salvatore dot filippone at uniroma2 dot it>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:36:29 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Bug fortran/52846] [F2008] Support submodules - part 3/3
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGkQGiJ-HQA97YRC0fSjR4KFxS=7ft8ci6YjYyO7AWGi_md+cw at mail dot gmail dot com> <55B10B58 dot 9000302 at sfr dot fr> <CAGkQGi+NODX-wo+HKOf1V9nD8PHUVdH9OSU_vaDHJct20DP0Tw at mail dot gmail dot com> <00370BD5-507A-42BF-9D59-E868BBAD3C94 at sourceryinstitute dot org> <CAGkQGiJDdTKbBrUYa-wG4iKHM7brF8=sGT=O6-gNgEEmfo0RXQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150729151154 dot GK3335 at redhat dot com> <12CFFDD1-93B6-49D9-834A-03B307506CC2 at gmail dot com>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:31:57PM +0200, FX wrote:
> > Why do you initialize a static variable to false?
>
> You mean because false is equal to zero and it will be the default initialization anyway?
Yes.
> I quite like that the default value is explicit.
Ok then.
Marek