This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Richard, For Aarch64 target, I was trying to vectorize the expression "arr[i]=arr[i]*4;" via vector shifts instructions since they don't have vector mults. unsigned long int __attribute__ ((aligned (64)))arr[100]; int i; #if 1 void test_vector_shifts() { for(i=0; i<=99;i++) arr[i]=arr[i]<<2; } #endif void test_vectorshift_via_mul() { for(i=0; i<=99;i++) arr[i]=arr[i]*4; } I found a similar PR and your comments https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952#c6. Based on that and IRC discussion I had with you, I added vector recog pattern that transforms mults to shifts. The vectorizer is now able to generate vector shifts for the above test case. PR case also gets vectorized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952#c10. This is just an initial patch and tries to optimize integer type power 2 constants. I wanted to get feedback on this . I bootstrapped and reg tested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu . Regards, Venkat.
Attachment:
vectorize_mults_shift.diff.txt
Description: vectorize_mults_shift.diff.txt
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |