This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Move ~X | X -> -1 folding
- From: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>
- To: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:13:14 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move ~X | X -> -1 folding
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150630084620 dot GN10139 at redhat dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 20 dot 1506301056540 dot 1977 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <20150630102407 dot GO10139 at redhat dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 20 dot 1506301337200 dot 1977 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <20150630124600 dot GQ10139 at redhat dot com> <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 11 dot 1506301447340 dot 22477 at zhemvz dot fhfr dot qr> <20150630125744 dot GS10139 at redhat dot com>
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:47:49PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > > > Does my suggestion to "build the all_ones constant in TREE_TYPE (@0) and
> > > > convert that to type" help for that?
> > >
> > > It appears to work, but it seems weird to me to create a integer constant
> > > in one type and then immediately cast it to another type.
> >
> > Yes. Do you have a testcase now that fails using bools?
>
> I don't have a testcase that fails with the pattern we currently have, i.e.
> the one with tree_nop_conversion_p.
I mean with removing tree_nop_conversion_p.
Richard.