This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR65914
- From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:36:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR65914
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1434753359 dot 2747 dot 70 dot camel at gnopaine>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Bill Schmidt
<wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65914 demonstrates that we
> fail to match vector predicates with pseudos that are in the virtual
> stack register range. The reduced test case provided with the bug
> report, when compiled for the C++14 standard, demonstrates that we need
> to be able to do this. This patch loosens the restriction for the
> vector predicates so that all pseudos are accepted. Thanks to Uli
> Weigand for his insights on this bug.
>
> As a side benefit, applying this patch fixes a number of libgomp tests
> that have been failing recently.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
> regressions. Is this ok for trunk? After it burns in, I would propose
> to backport it to GCC 5.1 and GCC 4.9 (when the tree is open).
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
> [gcc]
>
> 2015-05-19 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> * config/rs6000/predicates.md (altivec_register_operand): Permit
> virtual stack registers.
> (vsx_register_operand): Likewise.
> (vfloat_operand): Likewise.
> (vint_operand): Likewise.
> (vlogical_operand): Likewise.
Okay.
> [gcc/testsuite]
>
> 2015-05-19 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> * g++.dg/torture/pr65419.C: New.
Maybe you should ask Richi or Jakub about the testcase because you are
placing it in a non-target-specific location. It should succeed on
all targets, but it may expose latent bugs on other targets.
Thanks, David