This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Ping][PATCH][libstdc++-v3] Add _GLIBCXX_HAVE_LIMIT_FSIZE to guard 27_io/fpos/14775.cc
- From: Renlin Li <renlin dot li at arm dot com>
- To: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:00:42 +0100
- Subject: [Ping][PATCH][libstdc++-v3] Add _GLIBCXX_HAVE_LIMIT_FSIZE to guard 27_io/fpos/14775.cc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5549CC2E dot 2060605 at arm dot com>
Ping~
Anybody can review this? Thank you!
Regards,
Renlin Li
On 06/05/15 09:09, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to add _GLIBCXX_HAVE_LIMIT_FSIZE to guard the
test.
In libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_hooks.cc. set_file_limit()
function is nullified when either _GLIBCXX_RES_LIMITS or
_GLIBCXX_HAVE_LIMIT_FSIZE is not defined.
_GLIBCXX_USE_LFS can cover _GLIBCXX_RES_LIMITS, however,
_GLIBCXX_HAVE_LIMIT_FSIZE is not checked.
The complete condition for correct execution of this test case is
that, those two macros are both defined.
Is Okay to commit?
Regards,
Renlin Li
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
2015-05-06 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
* testsuite/27_io/fpos/14775.cc: Add _GLIBCXX_HAVE_LIMIT_FSIZE check.