This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Ping ** 0.5 patch, fortran] Inline matmul with conjugate complex numbers
- From: Mikael Morin <mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr>
- To: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 20:23:19 +0200
- Subject: Re: Ping ** 0.5 patch, fortran] Inline matmul with conjugate complex numbers
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header dot from=mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr
- References: <5559109F dot 80406 at netcologne dot de> <555E1B31 dot 9050806 at netcologne dot de>
Le 21/05/2015 19:51, Thomas Koenig a Ãcrit :
> Am 18.05.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
>> this patch extends the inline matmul functionality to conjugate
>> complex numbers.
>> Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
> OK (with the trivial change in the follow-up e-mail)?
> I'd like to start extending this to TRANSPOSE(CONJG(A)) :-)
There is little that is specific to conjg (any elemental function would
work roughly the same), but anyway, the patch is OK.