This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch 26/29] libstdc++-v3: Use automake-1.11.6 (across the tree)
- From: Michael Haubenwallner <michael dot haubenwallner at ssi-schaefer dot com>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl dot de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>, Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Kai Tietz <ktietz at redhat dot com>, Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>, Benjamin De Kosnik <bkoz at gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 13:59:01 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch 26/29] libstdc++-v3: Use automake-1.11.6 (across the tree)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5548E9C3 dot 1090408 at ssi-schaefer dot com> <5549EB29 dot 3010706 at ssi-schaefer dot com> <20150513102742 dot GA30202 at redhat dot com>
On 05/13/2015 12:27 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 06/05/15 12:21 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> Patch for libstdc++-v3.
>
> The libstd++ parts are OK.
>
> N.B. libstdc++ patches should be sent to the libstdc++ list (which
> saves you CCing individual maintainers.)
Indeed, thanks!
> (Will this change mean I need to have 1.11.1 and 1.11.6 both installed
> and adjust my path depending on whether I'm working on trunk or a 4.x
> branch?)
As long as 4.x stays with 1.11.1, basically yes...
There have been different versions used by different committers already,
which actually brought me to this version sync/bump topic. However, I'm
unsure whether (or how) to ensure automake versions persist in sync.
/haubi/