This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch 0/29] RFC: Use automake-1.11.6 across the tree

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Haubenwallner <michael dot haubenwallner at ssi-schaefer dot com>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl dot de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>, Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Kai Tietz <ktietz at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 12:49:50 -0600
Subject: Re: [patch 0/29] RFC: Use automake-1.11.6 across the tree
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <5548E9C3 dot 1090408 at ssi-schaefer dot com> <554A2094 dot 5090304 at redhat dot com> <554B8A11 dot 7080401 at ssi-schaefer dot com>

On 05/07/2015 09:51 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:


Are there any cases where you had to do something other than just regenerate the various files?


Nope - at least nothing that I would call "doing something other". What I did:
* touch each configure.ac to ensure automake is really used
* do 'make bootstrap' with one single job (updating scripts while running them is bad)
* once-off add "testsuite/other-tests/Makefile" to AC_CONFIG_FILES in libvtv/configure.ac,
   as that is unused but shows up in the "by automake 1.11.x" search

If not, then as long as you fix the ChangeLog entries per Jakub's comments and ensure that you've also tested Ada, then this can be installed into the trunk.


Sure, and two more:
* Sort out whether to update those top-level "missing" scripts.

Seems like we should if they came from automake.

* Bump to automake 1.11.6 even in gcc/doc/install.texi, patch attached.

Yup.

Presumably there's some reason why we're not stepping to 1.12 that Imissed in the discussion?


Jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/29] RFC: Use automake-1.11.6 across the tree
  - From: Joseph Myers

References:
- [patch 0/27] RFC: Use automake-1.11.6 across the tree
  - From: Michael Haubenwallner
- Re: [patch 0/27] RFC: Use automake-1.11.6 across the tree
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [patch 0/29] RFC: Use automake-1.11.6 across the tree
  - From: Michael Haubenwallner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]