This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, i386]: Switch x86 to TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT
- From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac at gmail dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, "Zamyatin, Igor" <igor dot zamyatin at intel dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 22:00:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, i386]: Switch x86 to TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAFULd4Yok8wdF4jP30WRegRkLTKy-F-Bu-8h4iJgzbyg7T=igw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOq4ujaxs+M2at7BNC1DKy27NghkFS1uzjb1HzjRkk79kQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAOvf_xxWYCsy4LLjQTj2zW-St1fPQ3S8zcwZ49m2u+WDdgeqSA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFULd4acXR4sR2GUViUWdo3VT8Moch4xR6kPb6vs4e_SDsJJHw at mail dot gmail dot com> <22514E96-3ABF-44E6-B8B8-4341F6583E92 at gmail dot com>
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've checked spec2000 performance.
>>> Only few spec binaries differ. Anyway performance is unchanged.
>>
>>Thanks, that confirms expectations.
>
> Are changes in generated code expected at all?
The change by itself should have no effect on the code, but it is a
big change, so some unrelated perturbations in the code are expected.
Uros.