This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] Implement observer_ptr

On 05/02/2015 05:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/05/15 10:40 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/05/15 22:02 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 05/01/2015 05:01 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/05/15 16:37 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Tested on Linux-x64.

 Implement observer_ptr.

Thanks! Committed with some minor formatting changes.

I've also committed this to add feature-test macros and update the
docs. Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.

I pretty sure we're supposed to add the macro for *all* the headers that got enable_if.

That's not how I read the Fundamentals TS:

Programmers who wish to determine whether a feature is available in
an implementation should base that determination on the presence of
the header (determined with __has_include(<header/name>)) and the
state of the macro with the recommended name.

And the header for erase_if is listed as <experimental/vector>.

And SD-6 says:

 For library features, the âHeaderâ column identifies the header that
 is expected to define the macro, although the macro may also be

OK.  Thanks.

I do remember an SD-6 discussion about how annoying the define-the-macro-in-all-relevant-headers was.
I didn't know there was a resolution.  I need to reeducate myself.
Meanwhile I'll rollback my patch.

Reverted in 222722.

I'll ask next time.
Sorry for the noise.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]