This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C PATCH to reject va_arg (ap, void) (PR c/65901)
- From: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
- To: Martin Sebor <msebor at redhat dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:37:11 +0200
- Subject: Re: C PATCH to reject va_arg (ap, void) (PR c/65901)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150427173052 dot GA11448 at redhat dot com> <55404ADD dot 3020308 at redhat dot com> <20150429164122 dot GB3384 at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 06:41:22PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 09:07:09PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > The error message in the test cases below isn't quite right.
> > The type of the aggregates isn't undefined, it's incomplete.
> > Looking at the function, I wonder if the first argument
> > should be EXPR rather than than NULL_TREE? Alternatively,
> > experimenting with other cases where GCC diagnoses invalid
> > uses of incomplete type, I see that it issues:
> >
> > "invalid application of %qs to incomplete type %qT"
> >
> > which might work even better here since we could name the
> > expression (va_arg).
>
> Yeah, I haven't concerned myself with the exact wording of the error
> message much, and I agree it could be improved. But passing down the
> EXPR would mean that the compiler outputs "'ap' has an incomplete type"
> and that looks wrong as well. I think I'm going to apply the following
> tomorrow if I hear no objections (and it passes testing). Thanks for noticing.
Committed now.
> (And I think c_incomplete_type_error deserves some TLC; I'll post a separate
> patch.)
>
> 2015-04-29 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
>
> * c-typeck.c (c_build_va_arg): Clarify the error message.
>
> * gcc.dg/pr65901.c (foo): Adjust dg-error.
>
> diff --git gcc/c/c-typeck.c gcc/c/c-typeck.c
> index c58e918..028d2f81 100644
> --- gcc/c/c-typeck.c
> +++ gcc/c/c-typeck.c
> @@ -12645,14 +12645,17 @@ c_build_qualified_type (tree type, int type_quals)
> tree
> c_build_va_arg (location_t loc, tree expr, tree type)
> {
> - if (warn_cxx_compat && TREE_CODE (type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE)
> - warning_at (loc, OPT_Wc___compat,
> - "C++ requires promoted type, not enum type, in %<va_arg%>");
> - if (type == error_mark_node || !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))
> + if (error_operand_p (type))
> + return error_mark_node;
> + else if (!COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))
> {
> - c_incomplete_type_error (NULL_TREE, type);
> + error_at (loc, "second argument to %<va_arg%> is of incomplete "
> + "type %qT", type);
> return error_mark_node;
> }
> + else if (warn_cxx_compat && TREE_CODE (type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE)
> + warning_at (loc, OPT_Wc___compat,
> + "C++ requires promoted type, not enum type, in %<va_arg%>");
> return build_va_arg (loc, expr, type);
> }
>
> diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr65901.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr65901.c
> index 8708a1e..b40eea3 100644
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr65901.c
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr65901.c
> @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ union U;
> void
> foo (__builtin_va_list ap)
> {
> - __builtin_va_arg (ap, void); /* { dg-error "invalid use of void expression" } */
> - __builtin_va_arg (ap, struct S); /* { dg-error "invalid use of undefined type" } */
> - __builtin_va_arg (ap, enum E); /* { dg-error "invalid use of undefined type" } */
> - __builtin_va_arg (ap, union U); /* { dg-error "invalid use of undefined type" } */
> + __builtin_va_arg (ap, void); /* { dg-error "second argument to .va_arg. is of incomplete type .void." } */
> + __builtin_va_arg (ap, struct S); /* { dg-error "second argument to .va_arg. is of incomplete type .struct S." } */
> + __builtin_va_arg (ap, enum E); /* { dg-error "second argument to .va_arg. is of incomplete type .enum E." } */
> + __builtin_va_arg (ap, union U); /* { dg-error "second argument to .va_arg. is of incomplete type .union U." } */
> }
Marek