This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix list.cc xmethods test.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:18:33 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix list.cc xmethods test.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <yjt2fv7lurpw dot fsf at ruffy dot mtv dot corp dot google dot com> <CAH6eHdTEacxQCsCBq6LW1U-7h0h35q+2Su6p_CGEpWto30Hc_g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADPb22TXmpaGgwOiMwU1+E==8ouzw_xyoP3EH_An4wpp4075zQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 29 April 2015 at 17:04, Doug Evans wrote:
> Tested the same patch on the gcc 5.0 branch.
> Just double checking ... ok to apply there too?
Yes, OK for the branch too.
> btw, the test is currently marked as unsupported by the test run.
> I don't know what would be involved in marking it as failing instead,
> but I noticed this happening a lot while I was working with this code.
> I can imagine more failures going unnoticed because of this.
That's due to:
(*): Shared library is missing debugging information.^M
skipping: (*): Shared library is missing debugging information.^M
list.gdb:10: Error in sourced command file:^M
Cannot evaluate function -- may be inlined^M
skipping: list.gdb:10: Error in sourced command file:^M
skipping: Cannot evaluate function -- may be inlined^M
UNSUPPORTED: libstdc++-xmethods/list.cc
But I can't say anything more useful than that.