This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc make clean fixes
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Jim Wilson <jim dot wilson at linaro dot org>
- Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:05:06 -0700
- Subject: Re: gcc make clean fixes
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CABXYE2UcFN1AugwUag30UUD_mB+jZ4-ymvH+JiJ9=h--uq4StQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <553E8E60 dot 6070201 at redhat dot com> <CABXYE2V9Yo4uce8tug2-qA1MNcBetPqZE5qDcG2NHuMon4qDmw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Jim Wilson <jim.wilson@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Looks good to me. Please install if you haven't already done so.
>
> Thanks, I checked in the patch. I'm not maintainer of anything
> currently,
Actually, you are still listed:
ia64 port Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
scheduler (+ haifa) Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
debugging code Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
If you want to step down from any of those officially, you’d have to remove a line. :-)
> so I'm assuming all of my patches need to be approved
> before check in.
Governing bits from gcc/MAINTAINERS:
Global Reviewers
Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
Note that while global reviewers can approve changes to any part of
the compiler or associated libraries, they still need approval for
their own patches from other maintainers or reviewers.
This is slightly different from the last time you read the file. It used to be global maintainers and they could put anything, anywhere.