This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 03/12] more removal of ifdef HAVE_cc0
- From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: tbsaunde+gcc at tbsaunde dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:51:14 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] more removal of ifdef HAVE_cc0
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1429622658-9034-1-git-send-email-tbsaunde+gcc at tbsaunde dot org> <1429622658-9034-4-git-send-email-tbsaunde+gcc at tbsaunde dot org>
On 04/21/2015 07:24 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders <email@example.com>
2015-04-21 Trevor Saunders <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* combine.c (find_single_use): Remove HAVE_cc0 ifdef for code
that is trivially ded on non cc0 targets.
* cse.c (new_basic_block): Likewise.
* rtlanal.c (canonicalize_condition): Likewise.
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_binary_operation_1): Likewise.
OK. I find myself wondering if the conditionals should look like
But I doubt it makes any measurable difference. It's something we can
always add in the future if we feel the need to avoid the runtime checks
for things that aren't ever going to happen on most modern targets.