This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 6/8] Handle SCRATCH in decompose_address

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim dot kuvyrkov at linaro dot org>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:31:14 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] Handle SCRATCH in decompose_address
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <C9BA4857-0F47-4FF7-AE05-3AEBFB05B786 at linaro dot org> <54480D68 dot 8090709 at redhat dot com> <C4A84B40-CDB9-4C48-9A68-6E8126EEAFBC at linaro dot org> <54484961 dot 9030700 at redhat dot com> <8294DE5D-43DE-446B-B879-F1428F4A7532 at linaro dot org>

On 01/28/2015 12:03 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:

Hi,

Turns out that the above patch applies without conflicts to two
functions in rtlanal.c: get_base_term(), for which the patch is
intended, and get_index_term(), for which the patch is not.

Due to git rebases and patch updates, I have accidentally pushed the
patch twice and unintentionally changed get_index_term().  From what
I can tell the change is benign, but, still, it is unnecessary.  The
attached patch reverts the accidental commit.  It was bootstrapped
arm-linux-gnueabihf.

OK for stage 1?  I'll regtest it before committing, just in case.

Thanks,

-- Maxim Kuvyrkov www.linaro.org



0001-Revert-accidental-commit-get_base_index-was-the-inte.patch


From 64cb581f9d2d1c1847b8dadd3acbf0d89080b7ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001 From: Maxim Kuvyrkov<maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 27
Jan 2015 07:24:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Revert accidental commit,
get_base_index was the intended target

* rtlanal.c (get_index_term): Revert accidental commit.


OK.
jeff

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]