Re: [debug-early] Remove redundant argument to add_subscript_info

[Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>]

On 03/26/2015 12:16 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Is there a reason we pass a collapsible option to add_subscript_info? It
> seems like it's value is always !is_ada().  Can we just get rid of the
> argument, and calculate its value within the function, or was it there
> for some future flexibility?

On trunk, this is calculated in one place, in gen_array_type_die, and 
it's passed down for consistency.  I'd rather not change it to be 
calculated in multiple places, as in this patch.  I would be fine, 
however, with changing collapse_nested_arrays to a function that returns 
!is_ada().

Jason