This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR65538


> Hi.
> 
> In following patch, I've added missing delete call for all item summaries that are
> allocated within a function_summary container in case the container does not use
> GGC memory allocation.
> 
> Can boostrap on ppc64le and no regression is seen on x86_64-linux-pc.
> 
> Ready for trunk?
> Thanks,
> Martin

> >From c9912b88e8a381e6be7dc1e4be4f7b8859d72e2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: mliska <mliska@suse.cz>
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:58:50 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR65538.
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2015-03-24  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
> 
> 	PR tree-optimization/65538
> 	* symbol-summary.h (function_summary::~function_summary):
> 	Relese memory for allocated summaries in case non-GGC template
> 	instance.
> ---
>  gcc/symbol-summary.h | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/symbol-summary.h b/gcc/symbol-summary.h
> index 8d7e42c..35615ba 100644
> --- a/gcc/symbol-summary.h
> +++ b/gcc/symbol-summary.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,12 @@ public:
>      m_symtab_insertion_hook = NULL;
>      m_symtab_removal_hook = NULL;
>      m_symtab_duplication_hook = NULL;
> +
> +    /* Release all summaries in case we use non-GGC memory.  */
> +    typedef typename hash_map <int, T *, summary_hashmap_traits>::iterator map_iterator;
> +    if (!m_ggc)
> +      for (map_iterator it = m_map.begin (); it != m_map.end (); ++it)
> +	delete (*it).second;

I think you sould also do the walk with GGC memory and call ggc_free.
During WPA we almost never call ggc_collect so it is better to keep things explicitly freed.
OK with that change.

Honza


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]