This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 65370


On 03/10/2015 01:03 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Good question, but we don't have this issue, because for that we emit
anyway:

65370.C:11:36: error: default argument specified in explicit
specialization [-fpermissive]
  C<int>::C(const C<U>&, bool = false);

nothing changes about that kind of testcase, usual behavior.

Ah. So here we can ignore any template instantiation or specialization, with a comment that check_explicit_specialization will handle them. But I suspect that checking the decl itself will be better; I would expect checking the context to lead you to accept

template<> class C<int> {
  template <typename U>
  C(const C<U>&, bool);
};

template <typename U> C<int>::C(const C<U>&, bool = false);

Since here C<int> is a specialization of C, but the constructor is not itself a partial instantiation.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]