This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs] Mention xgene-1 in arm and aarch64, FreeBSD support for arm
- From: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at gmail dot com>
- To: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo dot tkachov at arm dot com>
- Cc: Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at foss dot arm dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gerald at pfeifer dot com" <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana dot Radhakrishnan at arm dot com>, Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus dot Shawcroft at arm dot com>, "philipp dot tomsich at theobroma-systems dot com" <philipp dot tomsich at theobroma-systems dot com>, "andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org" <andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:36:16 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs] Mention xgene-1 in arm and aarch64, FreeBSD support for arm
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <54DDC968 dot 9050101 at arm dot com> <54DDCE92 dot 1090702 at foss dot arm dot com> <54ED9BAF dot 4060801 at arm dot com>
On 25 February 2015 at 09:53, Kyrill Tkachov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 13/02/15 10:14, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 13/02/15 09:52, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> This patch to changes.html mentions the xgene1 support in GCC 5 for arm
>>> and aarch64 and also the FreeBSD support for ARM.
>>> Is this ok?
>> The repetitive nature of all these new cpus being added looks rather
>> wooden. I think it would be better to merge them into one change block,
>> that lists all the cpus and their internal names, then mentions once at
>> the end that these names can be used as arguments to -mcpu and -mtune.
> Yeah, that makes sense. I've incorporated the feedback.
> Here's a proposed patch.
> How's this?
Looks fine to me, I suggest you go ahead and commit it. /Marcus