This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C PATCH] Handle typedef name as a flexible array member (PR c/64768)

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:53:38PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Since we had no testing for such cases whatsoever, I took existing flexible
> > array member tests and duplicated them, only adjusted them to use a typedef
> > name, so that we test as many scenarios as possible - I think this ought to
> > give us a reasonable level of confidence that this works as expected now.
> > 
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on {ppc64,x86_64}-linux, ok for trunk?
> OK, though the use of
> /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */
> is a relic of when dg-error / dg-warning used not to verify that 
> diagnostics were in fact errors / warnings; now they do check that, simply 
> using dg-error (on the line with the diagnostic, so not needing { target 
> *-*-* } and a line number) suffices rather than needing such a dg-bogus / 
> dg-error pair.

Thanks, I've fixed that up and committed the patch.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]