This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Fix UBSAN_OBJECT_SIZE lowering (PR sanitizer/65019)


Hi!

Similar problem to the recently fixed UBSAN_VPTR lowering,
ubsan_expand_objsize_ifn sets *gsi to the first stmt in a new bb
after splitting block after UBSAN_OBJECT_SIZE, which is the next stmt
that should be processed, so we should always return no_next = true
to avoid gsi_next on it before it will be processed.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2015-02-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR sanitizer/65019
	* ubsan.c (ubsan_expand_objsize_ifn): Always return true.

	* g++.dg/ubsan/pr65019.C: New test.

--- gcc/ubsan.c.jj	2015-02-10 22:58:55.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/ubsan.c	2015-02-11 17:20:36.313063536 +0100
@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ ubsan_expand_objsize_ifn (gimple_stmt_it
   /* Get rid of the UBSAN_OBJECT_SIZE call from the IR.  */
   unlink_stmt_vdef (stmt);
   gsi_remove (&gsi_orig, true);
-  return gsi_end_p (*gsi);
+  return true;
 }
 
 /* Cached __ubsan_vptr_type_cache decl.  */
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr65019.C.jj	2015-02-11 17:26:44.832959016 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr65019.C	2015-02-11 17:26:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// PR sanitizer/65019
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-fsanitize=alignment,object-size,vptr -std=c++11 -O2 -fcompare-debug" }
+
+struct A { };
+struct B { };
+struct C final {
+  C (const A &, int);
+  static B *foo (const A &, int = 1);
+  virtual ~C ();
+  void *c;
+};
+
+B *
+C::foo (const A &x, int y)
+{
+  C *d = new C (x, y);
+  if (d->c == nullptr)
+    delete d;
+}
+
+C::~C ()
+{
+}

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]