This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [libobjc] Fix failures on AIX (PR libobjc/63765)
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:07:42 -0800
- Subject: Re: [libobjc] Fix failures on AIX (PR libobjc/63765)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <yddpp9zjj49 dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <9437AFB4-E4EE-4666-8EDE-85C6F6FDCD1C at comcast dot net> <orwq46qcqy dot fsf at livre dot home> <ydd8uglkhnv dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <yddy4oedl8p dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
On Feb 4, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote:
> Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:
>>> On Jan 28, 2015, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Remove the definition of _XOPEN_SOURCE completely.
>>>> I think I prefer this one…
>>>> and there is no hint what host caused him to put the change in
>>>
>>> The 2005 timeframe suggests it was probably GNU/Linux
>> I'm with Mike here: either we remove the _XOPEN_SOURCE definition now
> It's been a week now since I posted the patches and there's still no
> conclusion which of the two alternatives to install.
Well, my position is the removal of _XOPEN_SOURCE is the right patch. I’ve not seen any substantive disagreement. I’d post and test that patch. A build person, a libobjc person, a reasonably an affected target person or a global person can approve in my book. I’m not any of them… If Pinski is happy with my approving it, he can weigh in. I’d be happy to approve it.