This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Do not xfail guality/pr{41447,41616}-1.c


On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:48:38AM -0800, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> These testcases currently XPASS on most targets and configs, so let's
> reduce the noise.  Okay for mainline?

Doesn't look like that is the case.  obj69 is x86_64, obj70 is i686.
grep '\(41447\|41616\).*execution' obj{69,70}/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O0  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O1  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O2  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O3 -g  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -Os  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O0  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O1  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O2  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O3 -g  execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -Os  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O0  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O1  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O2  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O2 -flto  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -O3 -g  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -Os  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O0  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O1  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O2  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O2 -flto  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O3 -g  execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -Os  execution test

At least pr41447 on i686...
So I'm not sure if this patch would not do more harm than good.

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]