This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Do not xfail guality/pr{41447,41616}-1.c
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:55:55 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Do not xfail guality/pr{41447,41616}-1.c
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <2adfe1d722cb3227d90b0ee769daa0488ee18d61 dot 1423050353 dot git dot segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:48:38AM -0800, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> These testcases currently XPASS on most targets and configs, so let's
> reduce the noise. Okay for mainline?
Doesn't look like that is the case. obj69 is x86_64, obj70 is i686.
grep '\(41447\|41616\).*execution' obj{69,70}/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O0 execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O1 execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O3 -g execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -Os execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O0 execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O1 execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O2 execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O3 -g execution test
obj69/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -Os execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O0 execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O1 execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 -flto execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XFAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O3 -g execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -Os execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O0 execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O1 execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O2 execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O2 -flto execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -O3 -g execution test
obj70/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c -Os execution test
At least pr41447 on i686...
So I'm not sure if this patch would not do more harm than good.
Jakub