This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [[ARM/AArch64][testsuite] 03/36] Add vmax, vmin, vhadd, vhsub and vrhadd tests.


On 19 January 2015 at 15:43, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 19 January 2015 at 14:29, Marcus Shawcroft
> <marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 16 January 2015 at 17:52, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>>> OK provided, as per the previous couple, that we don;t regression or
>>>> introduce new fails on aarch64[_be] or aarch32.
>>>
>>> This patch shows failures on aarch64 and aarch64_be for vmax and vmin
>>> when the input is -NaN.
>>> It's a corner case, and my reading of the ARM ARM is that the result
>>> should the same as on aarch32.
>>> I haven't had time to look at it in more details though.
>>> So, not OK?
>>
>> They should have the same behaviour in aarch32 and aarch64. Did you
>> test on HW or a model?
>>
> I ran the tests on qemu for aarch32 and aarch64-linux, and on the
> foundation model for aarch64*-elf.

Leave this one out until we understand why it fails. /Marcus


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]