Re: [PATCH] microblaze: microblaze.md: Use 'SI' instead of 'VOID' for operand 1 of 'call_value_intern'

[Chen Gang S <gang dot chen at sunrus dot com dot cn>]

Hello Maintainers:

It is finished with qemu today, it spends 13 days, the result is below,
please help check.

  With qemu:
                    === gcc Summary ===
    
    # of expected passes            83439
    # of unexpected failures        175
    # of unexpected successes       1
    # of expected failures          100
    # of unresolved testcases       349
    # of unsupported tests          1954
    /upstream/build-gcc-microblaze/gcc/xgcc  version 5.0.0 20141220 (experimental) (GCC)
  
  No qemu (originally):

                    === gcc Summary ===
    
    # of expected passes            65987
    # of unexpected failures        82
    # of unexpected successes       1
    # of expected failures          97
    # of unresolved testcases       16378
    # of unsupported tests          1810

If the result is OK, I shall start tile environments construction (
although, I guess, there is no qemu or sim for tile).

And also excuse me, during these days, gmail is broken in China, I have
to use my another mail address to send/receive emails.

Thanks.

On 12/21/14 05:45, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 12/21/2014 12:31 AM, Michael Eager wrote:
>> On 12/20/14 02:09, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> By the way, if this thread really has negative effect with other members,
>>> please warn me, I should not notify it to mailing list again, and try my
>>> best to finish it within myself.
>>
>> I appreciate your enthusiasm and perseverance in pursuing this bug.
>>
>> If the problem you are working on has changed from the mb-gcc issue,
>> change the subject.  Otherwise, keep up the good work.
>>
> 
> Thank you for your encouragement, and I should continue. At present, I
> guess my own main issues are:
> 
>  - Have no enough time resources on open source:
> 
>      sometimes need work overtime.
> 
>      need 4 hours per work day on subway between home and work office
>      (come 2 hours, go 2 hours, so total is 4 hours).
> 
>      need spend time for my child: check his homework, play with him.
>      (especially in weekend).
> 
>  - Really not familiar with gcc:
> 
>      Sometimes can find real world issues, but can not fix them in time.
> 
>      Sometimes can find coding issues, but do not know whether it can
>      cause real world issues or not (may also waste other members time
>      resources, but get no positive result).
> 
>  - Not familiar with related environments for each architectures.
> 
> So next, I should change myself for solving the issues above, firstly:
> 
>  - I shall try to spend 1-1.5 hours for reading gcc related documents (
>    e.g. "gcc info") in work day when I on subway (another time on subway
>    is for listening Holy Bible, reading news, or sleeping for a while).
> 
>  - I shall mainly forcus on finding real world issues and try to fix in
>    time. And stop finding coding issues (which may get negative effect
>    with others -- at least may waste other members time resources).
> 
>  - Still contiue for constructing all related enviroments (it is always
>    necessary) for architectures.
> 
> Welcome any ideas, suggestions or completions by any members.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed

-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed