This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] [SH] Split QI/HImode load/store via r0


On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 10:04 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> This patch is discussed in PR55212
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c77
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c82
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c83
> 
> and is to improve code quality with LRA.
> SH HI/QImode load/store instructions take r0 as the target/source register,
> except for SH2A.  Because of this and combine pass, the unsigned char/short
> memory accesses causes anomalous register spills in some case with LRA
> which can be seen in the above #c77.  The patch splits these load/store
> insn to two move insns via r0 when generating mov[qh]i.  It works as
> a kind of early reload.
> It will make some codes worse but it wins on average by CSiBE numbers.
> A bit interestingly, this reduces the total text size of CSiBE test ~0.04%
> at -O2 even for the trunk i.e. with the old reload, though currently
> it's enabled only for LRA.

Yes, that's true.  Although for non-LRA it's probably better to use
post-combine splits to do that (see my comment c#91 in PR 55212).

Anyway...

> --
> 	* config/sh/sh.c (prepare_move_operands): Split HI/QImode load/store
> 	to two move insns via r0.
> 
> diff --git a/config/sh/sh.c b/config/sh/sh.c
> index db9226e..1bf27db 100644
> --- a/config/sh/sh.c
> +++ b/config/sh/sh.c
> @@ -1778,6 +1778,38 @@ prepare_move_operands (rtx operands[], machine_mode mode)
>  	       && GET_CODE (XEXP (operands[0], 0)) == PLUS
>  	       && REG_P (XEXP (XEXP (operands[0], 0), 1)))
>  	operands[1] = copy_to_mode_reg (mode, operands[1]);
> +
> +      /* When the displacement addressing is used, RA will assign r0 to
> +	 the pseudo register operand for the QI/HImode load/store.
> +	 This tends to make a long live range for R0 and might cause
> +	 anomalous register spills in some case with LRA.  See PR
> +	 target/55212.
> +	 We split possible load/store to two move insns via r0 so as to
> +	 shorten R0 live range.  It will make some codes worse but will
> +	 win on avarage for LRA.  */
> +      else if (sh_lra_p ()
> +	       && TARGET_SH1 && ! TARGET_SH2A
> +	       && (mode == QImode || mode == HImode)
> +	       && ((REG_P (operands[0]) && MEM_P (operands[1]))
> +		   || (REG_P (operands[1]) && MEM_P (operands[0]))))
> +	{
> +	  bool load_p = REG_P (operands[0]);
> +	  rtx reg = operands[load_p ? 0 : 1];
> +	  rtx adr = XEXP (operands[load_p ? 1 : 0], 0);
> +
> +	  if (REGNO (reg) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
> +	      && GET_CODE (adr) == PLUS
> +	      && REG_P (XEXP (adr, 0))
> +	      && (REGNO (XEXP (adr, 0)) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
> +	      && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (adr, 1))
> +	      && INTVAL (XEXP (adr, 1)) != 0
> +	      && sh_legitimate_index_p (mode, XEXP (adr, 1), false, true))
> +	    {
> +	      rtx r0_rtx = gen_rtx_REG (mode, R0_REG);
> +	      emit_move_insn (r0_rtx, operands[1]);
> +	      operands[1] = r0_rtx;
> +	    }
> +	}
>      }
>  
>    if (mode == Pmode || mode == ptr_mode)

I think it's better to use already existing functions from the SH code
to make it a bit easier to read. E.g.:

Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/sh/sh.c	(revision 218988)
+++ gcc/config/sh/sh.c	(working copy)
@@ -1793,17 +1793,14 @@
 	       && ((REG_P (operands[0]) && MEM_P (operands[1]))
 		   || (REG_P (operands[1]) && MEM_P (operands[0]))))
 	{
-	  bool load_p = REG_P (operands[0]);
+	  bool load_p = arith_reg_dest (operands[0], GET_MODE (operands[0]));
 	  rtx reg = operands[load_p ? 0 : 1];
-	  rtx adr = XEXP (operands[load_p ? 1 : 0], 0);
+	  rtx mem = operands[load_p ? 1 : 0];
 
-	  if (REGNO (reg) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
-	      && GET_CODE (adr) == PLUS
-	      && REG_P (XEXP (adr, 0))
-	      && (REGNO (XEXP (adr, 0)) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
-	      && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (adr, 1))
-	      && INTVAL (XEXP (adr, 1)) != 0
-	      && sh_legitimate_index_p (mode, XEXP (adr, 1), false, true))
+	  if (displacement_mem_operand (mem, mode)
+	      && sh_disp_addr_displacement (mem) > 0
+	      && REGNO (reg) != R0_REG
+	      && !refers_to_regno_p (R0_REG, R0_REG + 1, mem, NULL))
 	    {
 	      rtx r0_rtx = gen_rtx_REG (mode, R0_REG);
 	      emit_move_insn (r0_rtx, operands[1]);



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]