This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 22/11/14 23:41, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Hi, After the conditional compare patches, the some of the gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c testcases start to fail. This was due to no longer duplicating simple_return and causing the epilogue to be duplicated. This changes the testcases to expect the non duplicated epilogue. Committed as obvious after a test of aarch64-elf. Thanks, Andrew Pinski ChangeLog: * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c: Expect only two loads of x30 (in the epilogue). * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c: Expect only one pair load of x30 and x19 (in the epilogue). * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c: Likewise.
Hi Andrew,I'm still seeing the original number of ldr x30 and ldp x19, x30 insns for these tests. What am I missing?
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c scan-assembler-times ldr\tx30, \\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 2 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tx19, x30, \\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 1 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tx19, x30, \\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 1 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c scan-assembler-times ldr\tx30, \\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 2 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tx19, x30, \\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 1
Thanks, Tejas,
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |