This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Ping]Re: [PR63762][4.9] Backport the patch which fixes "GCC generates UNPREDICTABLE STR with Rn = Rt for arm"


CCing release maintainers as well as they need to approve this
backport if Vlad is happy with it.

Vlad - is this ok to go back as it fixes a bug for ARM in the 4.9 tree
that came up in building bits of debian.

Ramana

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com> wrote:
> On 01/12/14 15:58, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27/11/14 15:37, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26/11/14 18:12, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26/11/14 12:16, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 20/11/14 16:17, Renlin Li wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is a backport for gcc-4_9-branch of the patch "[PR63762]GCC
>>>>>>>>>> generates
>>>>>>>>>> UNPREDICTABLE STR with Rn = Rt for arm" posted in:
>>>>>>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02253.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> arm-none-eabi has been test on the model, no new issues.
>>>>>>>>>> bootstrapping
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> regression tested on x86, no new issues.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is it Okay for gcc-4_9-branch?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2014-11-20  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>         PR middle-end/63762
>>>>>>>>>>         * ira.c (ira): Update preferred class.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2014-11-20  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>         PR middle-end/63762
>>>>>>>>>>         * gcc.dg/pr63762.c: New.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ping for it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please verify if it is the real fix for
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If yes, please add a testcase for PR 63661 and mention it in
>>>>>>>> your ChangeLog entry.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi H.J.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, I have verified that, this patch additionally fixes PR 63661.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I observed the same behaviour as I saw on arm backend. It will be
>>>>>>> great
>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>> you can double check they are caused by exactly the same reason.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will ask our people to take a look.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A new testcase has been added, ChangeLog has been updated to reflect
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> change. Updated patch has bee attached.
>>>>>>> Okay for gcc-4_9-branch?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Renlin Li
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014-11-26  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        PR middle-end/63762
>>>>>>>        PR middle-end/63661
>>>>>>>        * ira.c (ira): Update preferred class.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014-11-26  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        PR middle-end/63661
>>>>>>>        PR middle-end/63762
>>>>>>>        * testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63661.c: New.
>>>>>>>        * testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63762.c: New.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> pr63661.c should be moved to gcc.target/i386 and run it
>>>>>> on PIC target.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi H.J.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch has been adjusted according to your suggestion.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-11-27  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>       PR middle-end/63762
>>>>>       PR target/63661
>>>>>       * ira.c (ira): Update preferred class.
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-11-27  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>       PR middle-end/63762
>>>>>       PR target/63661
>>>>>       * testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63762.c: New.
>>>>>       * testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63661.c: New.
>>>>
>>>>           ^^^^^^^^^^^  No testsuite/
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi H.J.
>>>>
>>>> gcc.target/i386/pr63661.c should be checked into trunk first.
>>>>
>>> A separate patch is sent to mailing list for this.
>>>
>>>
>>> ChangeLog has been corrected.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Renlin Li
>>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 2014-11-27  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>>>
>>>      PR middle-end/63762
>>>      PR target/63661
>>>      * ira.c (ira): Update preferred class.
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 2014-11-27  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>>>
>>>      PR middle-end/63762
>>>      PR target/63661
>>>      * gcc.dg/pr63762.c: New.
>>>      * gcc.target/i386/pr63661.c: New.
>>>
>>>
>> You need to update gcc.target/i386/pr63661.c from trunk.
>>
>>
>
> Update the test case for pr63661 from trunk.
>
> Okay for gcc-4_9-branch?
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2014-12-01  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>
>         PR middle-end/63762
>         PR target/63661
>         * ira.c (ira): Update preferred class.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2014-12-01  Renlin Li  <Renlin.Li@arm.com>
>                      H.J Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
>
>         PR middle-end/63762
>         PR target/63661
>         * gcc.dg/pr63762.c: New.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr63661.c: New.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]