This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Andrew, On Sat, 2014-11-22 20:20:08 -0800, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > The problem here is here is that OBJCOPY is not being set to the > newly built objcopy when compiling libgo. This patch adds > OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET to the toplevel configure/Makefile so that when > libgo is compiled OBJCOPY is set to OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET. > > I noticed this issue when building an aarch64 cross compile on an > older system where objcopy did not understand aarch64. > > OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64 with no regressions. Also > tested with a combined build for a cross compiler to > aarch64-linux-gnu. I just sent a patch set these days, bringing the configury of Binutils and GCC in sync again. Quite a number of changes accumulated in both trees that weren't merged. I'm quite willing to keep those in sync, but let's have a dicision whether or not we see those as common files---or not. That is, I would be grateful if you'd commit that patch after mine is accepted (or right away, if my patch set is rejected.) Would save me from some rebase hell. ;-) MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Alles wird gut! ...und heute wirds schon ein biÃchen besser. the second :
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |