Re: [PATCH] PR jit/63969: Fix segfault in error-handling when driver isn't found

[David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat dot com>]

On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 23:09 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2014, at 10:23 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > It's not clear to me if I can approve my own patches to the jit
> 
> So, to answer that, we look at MAINTAINERS, and look up your name:
> 
>                         Various Maintainers
> 
> jit                     David Malcolm           <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
> 
> So, this means that you can review other peoples work and approve it
> for the jit code, and you can review and approve your own work for the
> jit code.  This is the definition of Maintainer.  If you had been
> listed under Reviewers, you would need approval for your own work.
> 
> Now, that doesnât mean, you canât ask for a review for any reason you
> want.  :-)

[CCing Jeff]

Indeed, but Jeff wrote in another thread:
> JIT space, yours to approve :-) We haven't formalized that
> yet, but it'd be silly to do anything else.

[ https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02514.html ]

...and that got me wondering if:

(A) there's an additional governance step here that should happen, or

(B) if I can go ahead and commit suitably tested patches that are
confined to the:
   gcc/jit
   gcc/testsuite/jit.exp
subdirectories (and approve other people's such patches), or

(C) both i.e. do (B) whilst (A) is pending


Thanks
Dave