This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Of the calls to aarch64_simd_lane_bounds that remain in aarch64-simd.md: aarch64_get_lanedi aarch64_im_lane_boundsi aarch64_ld{2,3,4}_lane<mode> I'll handle the first two. Do we have a plan for ld2/3/4 ? --Alan Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 12 November 2014 17:47, Charles Baylis <charles.baylis@linaro.org> wrote:On 12 November 2014 15:35, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawrence@arm.com> wrote:Nice! One nit - can the extra "tree" argument be a "const_tree" ? - I'll defer to the maintainers on the use of C++ default arguments in the AArch64 backend. But LGTM.Thanks, good catch. The default parameter will go away once all of the calls in the machine description are removed. I've respun the patch with const_tree.What is the plan for getting rid of the default arguments? Cheers /Marcus
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |