This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2] Fix PR56480 aka DR374. Allow explicit specialization in enclosing namespace.

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 21:12:56 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix PR56480 aka DR374. Allow explicit specialization in enclosing namespace.
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20141102125814 dot GB31234 at x4> <20141102132914 dot GC31234 at x4> <20141102141550 dot GD31234 at x4>

On 11/02/2014 09:15 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:

+      if (cxx_dialect < cxx11)
+	{
+	  permerror (input_location, "specialization of %qD in different "
+		     "namespace", tmpl);
+	  permerror (input_location, "  from definition of %q+#D", tmpl);
+	}
+      else
+	check_explicit_instantiation_namespace (tmpl);

In most cases I think DRs should apply to C++98 as well. In this case Ithink a pedwarn only with -pedantic in C++98 is appropriate. Let's putall the logic in check_.... And add a flag to distinguish betweeninstantiation and specialization.


Jason

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH v3] Fix PR56480 aka DR374. Allow explicit specialization in enclosing namespace.
  - From: Markus Trippelsdorf

References:
- [PATCH] Fix PR56480 aka DR374. Allow explicit specialization in enclosing namespace.
  - From: Markus Trippelsdorf
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR56480 aka DR374. Allow explicit specialization in enclosing namespace.
  - From: Markus Trippelsdorf
- [PATCH v2] Fix PR56480 aka DR374. Allow explicit specialization in enclosing namespace.
  - From: Markus Trippelsdorf

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]