This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Cesar! On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:22:52 -0700, Cesar Philippidis <cesar@codesourcery.com> wrote: > There is a reduction bug [...] Thanks for looking into this! > This is a problem because initialize_reduction_data originally expected > a GIMPLE_BIND at the very beginning of a parallel block. [...] Does your patch also fix the issue that Jim saw in his C++ work? > This patch also includes a runtime test case. I won't apply it to > gomp-4_0-branch just yet. But I wanted to demonstrate a test case > nonetheless. You can add it as a compile test, and I'll toggle to a run test as part of the merge into our internal development branch. > Also, note that part of this patch also changes a comment. > I found some typos in the original comment, so I took the opportunity to > fix them, I hope. Sure, and it's also always fine to separately apply such patches under the obvious rule. > Is this OK for gomp-4_0-branch? Yes, with the following addressed: > --- a/gcc/omp-low.c > +++ b/gcc/omp-low.c > @@ -10140,11 +10140,20 @@ process_reduction_data (gimple_seq *body, gimple_seq *in_stmt_seqp, [...]/source-gcc/gcc/omp-low.c: In function 'void _ZL22process_reduction_dataPP21gimple_statement_baseS1_S1_P11omp_context.isra.167.constprop.180(gimple_statement_base**, gimple_statement_base**, gimple_statement_base**, gimple)': [...]/source-gcc/gcc/omp-low.c:10172:14: warning: 'inner' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] gimple_seq inner; ^ > --- /dev/null > +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c/collapse-4.c > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ > +/* { dg-do run } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c99" } */ > + > +#include <string.h> > +#include <stdlib.h> > +#include <stdio.h> > + > +int > +main (void) > +{ > + int i2, l = 0, r = 0; > + int a[3][3][3]; > + int b[3][3]; A lot of these variables are unused. > +printf("&a %p\n", &a[0][0][0]); > +printf("&i2 %p\n", &i2); > +printf("&l %p\n", &l); > +printf("&r %p\n", &r); Please remove <stdio.h> include and the printfs, or at least put those into DEBUG conditionals. GrÃÃe, Thomas
Attachment:
pgpqwSW8gn0Wx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |