This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] microblaze: microblaze.md: Use 'SI' instead of 'VOID' for operand 1 of 'call_value_intern'
- From: Michael Eager <eager at eagerm dot com>
- To: Chen Gang <gang dot chen dot 5i5j at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, davem at redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:03:26 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: microblaze.md: Use 'SI' instead of 'VOID' for operand 1 of 'call_value_intern'
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <53B9246A dot 5090408 at gmail dot com> <53EB7FE3 dot 40406 at eagerm dot com> <53EC1264 dot 2080205 at gmail dot com> <540C7703 dot 7090303 at gmail dot com> <540D1363 dot 10909 at gmail dot com> <540DCB1B dot 40901 at gmail dot com> <54154907 dot 2000007 at gmail dot com>
On 09/14/14 00:51, Chen Gang wrote:
Hello maintainers:
I also find some warnings during compiling microblaze, I also shall try
to fix them, but excuse me, I am not quite familiar the testsuite for
microblaze, could you provide any related information for it?
Hi Chen --
This is the gcc DejaGNU test suite. You can find info about DejaGNU
at http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu. There is also info about
testing GCC here: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Testing_GCC
Rather than the standard "make check-gcc" described on the wiki
page and elsewhere, I use a script which sets some configuration
options and executes runtest directly. This uses a MicroBlaze processor
simulator called vpexec which was included with an older version of
Xilinx's EDK. Xilinx no longer supports vpexec.
You can use a hardware target board to test microblaze-gcc,
or a different simulator such as QEMU.
--
Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077