This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH to support non-constexpr variable templates

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Ville Voutilainen <ville dot voutilainen at gmail dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:10:20 -0400
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH to support non-constexpr variable templates
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAFk2RUaCvOsUZOqRN7jM+mj3QU16Pv4gaDfW0icbNK70-F_qdQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <53FAA54B dot 4000902 at redhat dot com> <CAFk2RUa=STZYVpw1XO=qr7O7+4UNYzbVrX7bi9uWPkXf+gDteQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <53FB305E dot 1040901 at redhat dot com> <l5ij9h dot nav8m8 dot 2yoola-qmf at mx dot google dot com> <CAFk2RUaAnxgvDq1RsOWU9ezZ3ssq+cUiDY39bLoxjYTLHcGrcw at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 08/25/2014 03:15 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:

should we just add these test-for-valid cases as new
tests? Or should they become
bug reports instead? Please advise how to best handle these.

Bug reports, please. Or perhaps multiple testcases on one bug report,for now. :)


Jason

References:
- Re: C++ PATCH to support non-constexpr variable templates
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: C++ PATCH to support non-constexpr variable templates
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH to support non-constexpr variable templates
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: C++ PATCH to support non-constexpr variable templates
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH to support non-constexpr variable templates
  - From: ville . voutilainen
- Re: C++ PATCH to support non-constexpr variable templates
  - From: Ville Voutilainen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]