This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Refactor handle_section_attribute to reduce nesting and distinguish error cases
- From: Trevor Saunders <tsaunders at mozilla dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 17:47:23 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactor handle_section_attribute to reduce nesting and distinguish error cases
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140824204229 dot GA1372 at thin> <CA+=Sn1=g4bEaq4H+iWgycKUGOHt1xMXdJRXvohQwUkt3Zd3cHQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 01:58:52PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> > handle_section_attribute contains many levels of nested conditionals and
> > branching code flow paths, with the error cases sometimes in the else
> > case and sometimes in the if case. Simplify the code flow into a series
> > of potential failure cases ending with the successful path, with no
> > nesting and no else clauses.
> > ---
> >
> > I started to work on an extension to the section attribute, and found
> > myself cleaning up the logic in handle_section_attribute; I wanted to
> > send this cleanup patch separately.
> >
> > I'm not a GCC committer, so I'm looking both for review and for someone
> > to commit this patch.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog | 5 +++
> > gcc/c-family/c-common.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
> > index 703a489..0286bfb 100644
> > --- a/gcc/ChangeLog
> > +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
> > @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
> > +2014-08-24 Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > +
> > + * c-family/c-common.c (handle_section_attribute): Refactor to reduce
> > + nesting and distinguish between error cases.
> > +
> > 2014-08-24 Oleg Endo <olegendo@gcc.gnu.org>
> >
> > PR target/61996
> > diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
> > index 58b9763..a63eedf 100644
> > --- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
> > +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
> > @@ -7387,58 +7387,59 @@ handle_section_attribute (tree *node, tree ARG_UNUSED (name), tree args,
> > {
> > tree decl = *node;
> >
> > - if (targetm_common.have_named_sections)
> > + if (!targetm_common.have_named_sections)
> > {
> > - user_defined_section_attribute = true;
> > + error_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (*node),
> > + "section attributes are not supported for this target");
> > + goto fail;
>
> Why not move this to a different function and then do:
>
> if (function(...))
> set_decl_section_name (decl, TREE_STRING_POINTER (TREE_VALUE (args)));
> else
> *no_add_attrs = true;
>
> return NULL_TREE;
>
> This is a way to get away from using gotos.
or you could just set no_add_attrs to true at the start of the function
and only set it to false when you know the attr is valid, which saves
the weirdness of a second function.
Trev
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
> > + }
> >
> > - if ((TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
> > - || TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL)
> > - && TREE_CODE (TREE_VALUE (args)) == STRING_CST)
> > - {
> > - if (TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL
> > - && current_function_decl != NULL_TREE
> > - && !TREE_STATIC (decl))
> > - {
> > - error_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl),
> > - "section attribute cannot be specified for "
> > - "local variables");
> > - *no_add_attrs = true;
> > - }
> > + user_defined_section_attribute = true;
> >
> > - /* The decl may have already been given a section attribute
> > - from a previous declaration. Ensure they match. */
> > - else if (DECL_SECTION_NAME (decl) != NULL
> > - && strcmp (DECL_SECTION_NAME (decl),
> > - TREE_STRING_POINTER (TREE_VALUE (args))) != 0)
> > - {
> > - error ("section of %q+D conflicts with previous declaration",
> > - *node);
> > - *no_add_attrs = true;
> > - }
> > - else if (TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL
> > - && !targetm.have_tls && targetm.emutls.tmpl_section
> > - && DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P (decl))
> > - {
> > - error ("section of %q+D cannot be overridden", *node);
> > - *no_add_attrs = true;
> > - }
> > - else
> > - set_decl_section_name (decl,
> > - TREE_STRING_POINTER (TREE_VALUE (args)));
> > - }
> > - else
> > - {
> > - error ("section attribute not allowed for %q+D", *node);
> > - *no_add_attrs = true;
> > - }
> > + if (TREE_CODE (decl) != FUNCTION_DECL && TREE_CODE (decl) != VAR_DECL)
> > + {
> > + error ("section attribute not allowed for %q+D", *node);
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> > - else
> > +
> > + if (TREE_CODE (TREE_VALUE (args)) != STRING_CST)
> > {
> > - error_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (*node),
> > - "section attributes are not supported for this target");
> > - *no_add_attrs = true;
> > + error ("section attribute argument not a string constant");
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL
> > + && current_function_decl != NULL_TREE
> > + && !TREE_STATIC (decl))
> > + {
> > + error_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl),
> > + "section attribute cannot be specified for local variables");
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> >
> > + /* The decl may have already been given a section attribute
> > + from a previous declaration. Ensure they match. */
> > + if (DECL_SECTION_NAME (decl) != NULL
> > + && strcmp (DECL_SECTION_NAME (decl),
> > + TREE_STRING_POINTER (TREE_VALUE (args))) != 0)
> > + {
> > + error ("section of %q+D conflicts with previous declaration", *node);
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL
> > + && !targetm.have_tls && targetm.emutls.tmpl_section
> > + && DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P (decl))
> > + {
> > + error ("section of %q+D cannot be overridden", *node);
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > +
> > + set_decl_section_name (decl, TREE_STRING_POINTER (TREE_VALUE (args)));
> > + return NULL_TREE;
> > +
> > +fail:
> > + *no_add_attrs = true;
> > return NULL_TREE;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.1.0
> >