This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch 1/2] Don't put out a call to memcpy for volatile struct operations
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, James Greenhalgh <james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, marcus-shawcroft at arm dot com, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:33:25 -0700
- Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] Don't put out a call to memcpy for volatile struct operations
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAFiYyc0+aLgfe0u482=rM=SKqTUME6oa50BUpufskTK5UGguRA at mail dot gmail dot com> <1408617247-21558-1-git-send-email-james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com> <CAFiYyc0oSTdhazQz64rBqs3UaZbG9qVDBSqU+0O3h4zbVbPW8Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <FF40C7D2-8FB3-4CE1-96FC-54B8F2C035A0 at comcast dot net> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408221541460 dot 24669 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On Aug 22, 2014, at 8:42 AM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
>> 1 - I use n843 for C99, which is slightly different from the standard, but in this case I suspect it is the same.
>
> Use N1256 (C99+TC1+TC2+TC3) instead.
Thanks. I had the C99.pdf to quote from, it is just the plain .txt file I find way easier than the pdf file. I’ve updated to n1256 as I found a .txt version of it.