This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [testsuite patch] add code to arm_thumbX_ok to exercise ABI


On 08/18/2014 07:36 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 8 August 2014 02:30, Janis Johnson <janis_johnson@mentor.com> wrote:
>> Running an arm-none-eabi test that adds "-mthumb" for a multilib that
>> uses "-march=armv5te -mfloat-abi=hard" works fine if the test doesn't
>> have any calls, but if it does then the effective-target checks for
>> arm_thumb1_ok and arm_thumb2_ok pass but the test's compile step fails
>> with "sorry, unimplemented: Thumb-1 hard-float VFP ABI".
>>
>> This patch adds code to those effective-target checks to exercise
>> argument handling and causes them to fail for the multilib flags
>> listed above.  Tested by running gcc.target/arm tests with a variety
>> of multilib flags.  OK for mainline and the 4.9 branch?
>>
>> Janis
> 
> Some time ago (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01501.html)
> I suggested to add similar stuff to check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_ok
> for similar reasons.
> 
> Do you agree?
> 

I agree but I prefer to have one of the ARM maintainers approve changes
like that; we sometimes have different philosophies about how to handle
additional options in tests.

Janis


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]