Re: Fix if-conversion pass for dead type-unsafe code

[Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries at mentor dot com>]

On 14-08-14 16:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com> wrote:
> > On 08-08-14 17:17, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > Maybe instead of a new mem_alias_equal_p simply compare MEM_ATTRs
> > > > with mem_attrs_eq_p?
> > >
> > >
> > > I propose to fix it this way (as attached) on 4.8/4.9/trunk, and maybe do
> > > a more
> > > efficient handling on trunk as a follow-up patch.
> > >
> > > I'll put this through bootstrap/test again.
> >
> >
> > Bootstrapped and reg-tested on trunk x86_64.
> >
> > Re-attached patch OK for trunk, 4.8, 4.9 ?
>
> Ok.

Backported to 4.8 and 4.9 as attached.

The emit-rtl.{c,h} part of my patch was superfluous on trunk given that you 
already exported mem_attrs_eq_p, something I failed to notice when rebasing. So 
the backport contains that part of your patch. I've tested the backport patch on 
4.9.

> (did you check the effect on code-generation?  that is, how many
> opportunities compiling GCC do we "lose"?)

I haven't done that. I can look into that (after I fix the tail-merge part of 
pr62004).

Thanks,
- Tom

2014-08-15  Tom de Vries  <tom@codesourcery.com>

	Backport from mainline:
	2014-08-14  Tom de Vries  <tom@codesourcery.com>

	PR rtl-optimization/62004
	PR rtl-optimization/62030
	* ifcvt.c (rtx_interchangeable_p): New function.
	(noce_try_move, noce_process_if_block): Use rtx_interchangeable_p.

	* gcc.dg/pr62004.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/pr62030.c: Same.
	* gcc.target/mips/pr62030-octeon.c: Same.

	2014-08-05  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

	* emit-rtl.h (mem_attrs_eq_p): Declare.
	* emit-rtl.c (mem_attrs_eq_p): Export.

diff --git a/gcc/emit-rtl.c b/gcc/emit-rtl.c
index 4736f8d..89b6768 100644
--- a/gcc/emit-rtl.c
+++ b/gcc/emit-rtl.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ const_fixed_htab_eq (const void *x, const void *y)
 
 /* Return true if the given memory attributes are equal.  */
 
-static bool
+bool
 mem_attrs_eq_p (const struct mem_attrs *p, const struct mem_attrs *q)
 {
   return (p->alias == q->alias
diff --git a/gcc/emit-rtl.h b/gcc/emit-rtl.h
index fe68de9..36eb0c8 100644
--- a/gcc/emit-rtl.h
+++ b/gcc/emit-rtl.h
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 #ifndef GCC_EMIT_RTL_H
 #define GCC_EMIT_RTL_H
 
+/* Return whether two MEM_ATTRs are equal.  */
+bool mem_attrs_eq_p (const struct mem_attrs *, const struct mem_attrs *);
+
 /* Set the alias set of MEM to SET.  */
 extern void set_mem_alias_set (rtx, alias_set_type);
 
diff --git a/gcc/ifcvt.c b/gcc/ifcvt.c
index 0d1adce..49ff85c 100644
--- a/gcc/ifcvt.c
+++ b/gcc/ifcvt.c
@@ -306,6 +306,28 @@ block_fallthru (basic_block bb)
 
   return (e) ? e->dest : NULL_BLOCK;
 }
+
+/* Return true if RTXs A and B can be safely interchanged.  */
+
+static bool
+rtx_interchangeable_p (const_rtx a, const_rtx b)
+{
+  if (!rtx_equal_p (a, b))
+    return false;
+
+  if (GET_CODE (a) != MEM)
+    return true;
+
+  /* A dead type-unsafe memory reference is legal, but a live type-unsafe memory
+     reference is not.  Interchanging a dead type-unsafe memory reference with
+     a live type-safe one creates a live type-unsafe memory reference, in other
+     words, it makes the program illegal.
+     We check here conservatively whether the two memory references have equal
+     memory attributes.  */
+
+  return mem_attrs_eq_p (get_mem_attrs (a), get_mem_attrs (b));
+}
+
 
 /* Go through a bunch of insns, converting them to conditional
    execution format if possible.  Return TRUE if all of the non-note
@@ -1034,6 +1056,9 @@ noce_try_move (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
       || (rtx_equal_p (if_info->a, XEXP (cond, 1))
 	  && rtx_equal_p (if_info->b, XEXP (cond, 0))))
     {
+      if (!rtx_interchangeable_p (if_info->a, if_info->b))
+	return FALSE;
+
       y = (code == EQ) ? if_info->a : if_info->b;
 
       /* Avoid generating the move if the source is the destination.  */
@@ -2504,7 +2529,7 @@ noce_process_if_block (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
       if (! insn_b
 	  || insn_b != last_active_insn (else_bb, FALSE)
 	  || (set_b = single_set (insn_b)) == NULL_RTX
-	  || ! rtx_equal_p (x, SET_DEST (set_b)))
+	  || ! rtx_interchangeable_p (x, SET_DEST (set_b)))
 	return FALSE;
     }
   else
@@ -2517,7 +2542,7 @@ noce_process_if_block (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
 	  || BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn_b) != BLOCK_FOR_INSN (if_info->cond_earliest)
 	  || !NONJUMP_INSN_P (insn_b)
 	  || (set_b = single_set (insn_b)) == NULL_RTX
-	  || ! rtx_equal_p (x, SET_DEST (set_b))
+	  || ! rtx_interchangeable_p (x, SET_DEST (set_b))
 	  || ! noce_operand_ok (SET_SRC (set_b))
 	  || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (x, SET_SRC (set_b))
 	  || modified_between_p (SET_SRC (set_b), insn_b, jump)
@@ -2583,7 +2608,7 @@ noce_process_if_block (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
 
   /* Look and see if A and B are really the same.  Avoid creating silly
      cmove constructs that no one will fix up later.  */
-  if (rtx_equal_p (a, b))
+  if (rtx_interchangeable_p (a, b))
     {
       /* If we have an INSN_B, we don't have to create any new rtl.  Just
 	 move the instruction that we already have.  If we don't have an
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr62004.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr62004.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c994a41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr62004.c
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-tail-merge" } */
+
+struct node
+{
+  struct node *next;
+  struct node *prev;
+};
+
+struct node node;
+
+struct head
+{
+  struct node *first;
+};
+
+struct head heads[5];
+
+int k = 2;
+
+struct head *head = &heads[2];
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  struct node *p;
+
+  node.next = (void*)0;
+
+  node.prev = (void *)head;
+
+  head->first = &node;
+
+  struct node *n = head->first;
+
+  struct head *h = &heads[k];
+
+  heads[2].first = n->next;
+
+  if ((void*)n->prev == (void *)h)
+    p = h->first;
+  else
+    /* Dead tbaa-unsafe load from ((struct node *)&heads[2])->next.  */
+    p = n->prev->next;
+
+  return !(p == (void*)0);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr62030.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr62030.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b8baf93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr62030.c
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+
+struct node
+{
+  struct node *next;
+  struct node *prev;
+};
+
+struct node node;
+
+struct head
+{
+  struct node *first;
+};
+
+struct head heads[5];
+
+int k = 2;
+
+struct head *head = &heads[2];
+
+static int __attribute__((noinline))
+foo (void)
+{
+  node.prev = (void *)head;
+  head->first = &node;
+
+  struct node *n = head->first;
+  struct head *h = &heads[k];
+  struct node *next = n->next;
+
+  if (n->prev == (void *)h)
+    h->first = next;
+  else
+    n->prev->next = next;
+
+  n->next = h->first;
+  return n->next == &node;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  if (foo ())
+    abort ();
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr62030-octeon.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr62030-octeon.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5e3d3b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr62030-octeon.c
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=octeon" } */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+
+struct node
+{
+  struct node *next;
+  struct node *prev;
+};
+
+struct node node;
+
+struct head
+{
+  struct node *first;
+};
+
+struct head heads[5];
+
+int k = 2;
+
+struct head *head = &heads[2];
+
+static int __attribute__((noinline))
+foo (void)
+{
+  node.prev = (void *)head;
+  head->first = &node;
+
+  struct node *n = head->first;
+  struct head *h = &heads[k];
+  struct node *next = n->next;
+
+  if (n->prev == (void *)h)
+    h->first = next;
+  else
+    n->prev->next = next;
+
+  n->next = h->first;
+  return n->next == &node;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  if (foo ())
+    abort ();
+  return 0;
+}
-- 
1.9.1