This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GSoC] Elimination of CLooG library installation dependency
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser dot es>, Mircea Namolaru <mircea dot namolaru at inria dot fr>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 13:44:57 +0200
- Subject: Re: [GSoC] Elimination of CLooG library installation dependency
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CABGF_gco8bbFoBD=PORcSp=Q_wQpqca2M72mRzmyRO46B0juFQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CABGF_gd-ecEcgSmEfmRYUPKkNoxxWxscx3WTVH6EpA989zwBPw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Roman Gareev <gareevroman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've attached the patch, which should eliminate CLooG library
>> installation dependency from GCC. The CLooG AST generator is still the
>> main code generator, but the isl ast generator will be chosen in case
>> of nonavailability of CLooG library.
>>
>> However, I've found out a problem. Almost all the functions of the ISL
>> cannot be used without installed CLooG. (I get errors which contain
>> âundefined reference to...â). Maybe I missed something. What do you
>> think about this?
>
> Iâve attached a patch, which contains mentioned changes and doesnât
> cause the error. I want to commit it in coming days. What do you think
> about it?
> Maybe we should make the ISL AST generator to be the main code
> generator of Graphite (the patch1 implements this). What do you think
> about it?
We definitely should do that (and rip out the cloog code after a while).
Richard.
>
> --
> Cheers, Roman Gareev.