This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 029/236] rtl_data.x_parm_birth_insn is an insn


On 08/06/14 11:20, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
	* function.h (struct rtl_data): Strengthen field
	"x_parm_birth_insn" from rtx to rtx_insn *.
	* function.c (struct assign_parm_data_all): Strengthen fields
	"first_conversion_insn" and "last_conversion_insn" from rtx to
	rtx_insn *.
OK. I think at this point any patch which merely changes the type of some variable or in a signature from rtx to rtx_insn (or any of the concrete passes) is considered trivial enough to go forward without explicit review.

That applies to patches in this series, additions you may need to make due to changes in the tree since you last rebased and further strengthening you or anyone else may want to tackle.



jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]