This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH][match-and-simplify] s/match_and_simplify/simplify/
- From: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:31:26 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: [PATCH][match-and-simplify] s/match_and_simplify/simplify/
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
This replaces match_and_simplify with just 'simplify' everywhere,
in patterns and API. It's shorter and as descriptive.
This also pushes two minor changes to not use APIs I consider
internal from SCCVN or forwprop.
Committed.
Richard.
2014-08-05 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
* doc/match-and-simplify.texi: s/match_and_simplify/simplify/g
* fold-const.c: Likewise.
* genmatch.c: Likewise.
* gimple-fold.c: Likewise.
* gimple-fold.h: Likewise.
* gimple-match-head.c: Likewise.
* match-bitwise.pd: Likewise.
* match-builtin.pd: Likewise.
* match-constant-folding.pd: Likewise.
* match-plusminus.pd: Likewise.
* match-rotate.pd: Likewise.
* match.pd: Likewise.
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c: Likewise.
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c: Likewise.
* gimple-fold.c (fold_stmt): Add overload with valueize parameter.
* gimple-fold.h (fold_stmt): Declare it.
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (pass_forwprop::execute): Use fold_stmt API.
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (try_to_simplify): Use
gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1 API.
* testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-1.c:
s/match_and_simplified/simplified/g
* testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-bitwise.c: Likewise
* testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-plusminus.c: Likewise
* testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-realimag.c: Likewise
* testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-rotate.c: Likewise
* testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr52631.c: Likewise
Index: gcc/doc/match-and-simplify.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/doc/match-and-simplify.texi (revision 213631)
+++ gcc/doc/match-and-simplify.texi (working copy)
@@ -38,19 +38,19 @@ The main GIMPLE API entry to the express
that of the GENERIC fold_@{unary,binary,ternary@} API:
@deftypefn
-tree gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
+tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
@end deftypefn
@deftypefn
-tree gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree,
+tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree,
gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
@end deftypefn
@deftypefn
-tree gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree, tree,
+tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree, tree,
gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
@end deftypefn
@deftypefn
-tree gimple_match_and_simplify (enum built_in_function, tree, tree,
+tree gimple_simplify (enum built_in_function, tree, tree,
gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
@end deftypefn
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ tie simplifications to a SSA lattice.
In addition to those APIs a fold_stmt-like interface is provided with
@deftypefn
-bool gimple_match_and_simplify (gimple_stmt_iterator *, tree (*)(tree));
+bool gimple_simplify (gimple_stmt_iterator *, tree (*)(tree));
@end deftypefn
which also has the additional valueization hook.
@@ -103,13 +103,13 @@ domain-specific languages GCC uses. Thu
with an example from the match.pd file on the branch:
@smallexample
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and @@0 integer_all_onesp)
@@0)
@end smallexample
This example contains all required parts of an expression simplification.
-A simplification is wrapped inside a @code{(match_and_simplify ...)} expression.
+A simplification is wrapped inside a @code{(simplify ...)} expression.
That contains at least two operands - an expression that is matched
with the GIMPLE or GENERIC IL and a replacement expression that is
returned if the match was successful.
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ you refer to it in other places of the m
above example it is refered to in the replacement expression.
@smallexample
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_xor @@0 @@0)
@{ build_zero_cst (type); @})
@end smallexample
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ operands written in C code. These can b
replacements and are supposed to evaluate to a tree node.
@smallexample
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(trunc_mod integer_zerop@@0 @@1)
(if (!integer_zerop (@@1)))
@@0)
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ which is also predicated with @code{inte
may be either expressions, predicates or captures. Captures
can be unconstrained or capture expresions or predicates.
-This example introduces an optional operand of match_and_simplify,
+This example introduces an optional operand of simplify,
the if-expression. This condition is evaluated after the
expression matched in the IL and is required to evaluate to true
to enable the replacement expression. The expression operand
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ of the @code{if} is a standard C express
to captures.
@smallexample
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and:c integral_op_p@@0 (bit_ior:c (bit_not @@0) @@1))
(bit_and @@1 @@0))
@end smallexample
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ Two more features exist to avoid too muc
@smallexample
(for op in plus pointer_plus minus bit_ior bit_xor
- (match_and_simplify
+ (simplify
(op @@0 integer_zerop)
@@0))
@end smallexample
@@ -187,10 +187,10 @@ operator specified, substituting @code{o
@smallexample
(if (!TYPE_SATURATING (type)
&& !FLOAT_TYPE_P (type) && !FIXED_POINT_TYPE_P (type))
- (match_and_simplify
+ (simplify
(minus (plus @@0 @@1) @@0)
@@1)
- (match_and_simplify
+ (simplify
(minus (minus @@0 @@1) @@0)
(negate @@1)))
@end smallexample
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fold-const.c (revision 213574)
+++ gcc/fold-const.c (working copy)
@@ -7793,8 +7793,8 @@ fold_unary_loc (location_t loc, enum tre
gcc_assert (IS_EXPR_CODE_CLASS (kind)
&& TREE_CODE_LENGTH (code) == 1);
- extern tree generic_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree);
- tem = generic_match_and_simplify (code, type, op0);
+ extern tree generic_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree);
+ tem = generic_simplify (code, type, op0);
if (tem)
return tem;
@@ -10086,8 +10086,8 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
&& op0 != NULL_TREE
&& op1 != NULL_TREE);
- extern tree generic_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree);
- tem = generic_match_and_simplify (code, type, op0, op1);
+ extern tree generic_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree);
+ tem = generic_simplify (code, type, op0, op1);
if (tem)
return tem;
@@ -14035,8 +14035,8 @@ fold_ternary_loc (location_t loc, enum t
gcc_assert (IS_EXPR_CODE_CLASS (kind)
&& TREE_CODE_LENGTH (code) == 3);
- extern tree generic_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree, tree);
- tem = generic_match_and_simplify (code, type, op0, op1, op2);
+ extern tree generic_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree, tree);
+ tem = generic_simplify (code, type, op0, op1, op2);
if (tem)
return tem;
Index: gcc/genmatch.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/genmatch.c (revision 213626)
+++ gcc/genmatch.c (working copy)
@@ -87,12 +87,12 @@ output_line_directive (FILE *f, source_l
transform = 'match_and_transform' name expr genop
Match and simplify (A + B) - B -> A
- (define_match_and_simplify foo
+ (simplify foo
(PLUS_EXPR (MINUS_EXPR integral_op_p@0 @1) @1)
@0)
Match and simplify (CST + A) + CST to CST' + A
- (define_match_and_simplify bar
+ (simplify bar
(PLUS_EXPR INTEGER_CST_P@0 (PLUS_EXPR @1 INTEGER_CST_P@2))
(PLUS_EXPR { int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, captures[0], captures[2]); } @1))
*/
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ expr::gen_transform (FILE *f, const char
fail if seq == NULL. */
fprintf (f, " if (!seq)\n"
" {\n"
- " res = gimple_match_and_simplify (%s, TREE_TYPE (ops[0])",
+ " res = gimple_simplify (%s, TREE_TYPE (ops[0])",
operation->op->id);
for (unsigned i = 0; i < ops.length (); ++i)
fprintf (f, ", ops[%u]", i);
@@ -1610,9 +1610,9 @@ decision_tree::gen_gimple (FILE *f)
for (unsigned n = 1; n <= 3; ++n)
{
fprintf (f, "\nstatic bool\n"
- "gimple_match_and_simplify (code_helper *res_code, tree *res_ops,\n"
- " gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree),\n"
- " code_helper code, tree type");
+ "gimple_simplify (code_helper *res_code, tree *res_ops,\n"
+ " gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree),\n"
+ " code_helper code, tree type");
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
fprintf (f, ", tree op%d", i);
fprintf (f, ")\n");
@@ -1648,7 +1648,7 @@ decision_tree::gen_generic (FILE *f)
for (unsigned n = 1; n <= 3; ++n)
{
fprintf (f, "\ntree\n"
- "generic_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code code, tree type ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED");
+ "generic_simplify (enum tree_code code, tree type ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED");
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
fprintf (f, ", tree op%d", i);
fprintf (f, ")\n");
@@ -2045,11 +2045,11 @@ parse_op (cpp_reader *r)
}
/* Parse
- (define_match_and_simplify "<ident>"
+ (simplify "<ident>"
<op> <op>) */
static simplify *
-parse_match_and_simplify (cpp_reader *r, source_location match_location)
+parse_simplify (cpp_reader *r, source_location match_location)
{
const cpp_token *token = peek (r);
const char *id;
@@ -2182,14 +2182,14 @@ parse_pattern (cpp_reader *r, vec<simpli
eat_token (r, CPP_OPEN_PAREN);
const cpp_token *token = peek (r);
const char *id = get_ident (r);
- if (strcmp (id, "match_and_simplify") == 0)
- simplifiers.safe_push (parse_match_and_simplify (r, token->src_loc));
+ if (strcmp (id, "simplify") == 0)
+ simplifiers.safe_push (parse_simplify (r, token->src_loc));
else if (strcmp (id, "for") == 0)
parse_for (r, token->src_loc, simplifiers);
else if (strcmp (id, "if") == 0)
parse_if (r, simplifiers);
else
- fatal_at (token, "expected 'match_and_simplify' or 'for'");
+ fatal_at (token, "expected 'simplify' or 'for' or 'if'");
eat_token (r, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN);
}
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 213574)
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.c (working copy)
@@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ gimple_fold_call (gimple_stmt_iterator *
distinguishes both cases. */
static bool
-fold_stmt_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, bool inplace)
+fold_stmt_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, bool inplace, tree (*valueize) (tree))
{
bool changed = false;
gimple stmt = gsi_stmt (*gsi);
@@ -1407,9 +1407,12 @@ fold_stmt_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
/* Dispatch to pattern-based folding.
??? Do this after the previous stuff as fold_stmt is used to make
- stmts valid gimple again via maybe_fold_reference of ops. */
+ stmts valid gimple again via maybe_fold_reference of ops.
+ ??? Use a lower-level API using a NULL sequence for inplace
+ operation, basically inline gimple_simplify (gsi)
+ as we are the only caller. */
if (!inplace
- && gimple_match_and_simplify (gsi, NULL))
+ && gimple_simplify (gsi, valueize))
changed = true;
return changed;
@@ -1425,7 +1428,13 @@ fold_stmt_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
bool
fold_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
{
- return fold_stmt_1 (gsi, false);
+ return fold_stmt_1 (gsi, false, NULL);
+}
+
+bool
+fold_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree (*valueize) (tree))
+{
+ return fold_stmt_1 (gsi, false, valueize);
}
/* Perform the minimal folding on statement *GSI. Only operations like
@@ -1440,7 +1449,7 @@ bool
fold_stmt_inplace (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
{
gimple stmt = gsi_stmt (*gsi);
- bool changed = fold_stmt_1 (gsi, true);
+ bool changed = fold_stmt_1 (gsi, true, NULL);
gcc_assert (gsi_stmt (*gsi) == stmt);
return changed;
}
@@ -2806,7 +2815,7 @@ gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1 (gimple s
tree lhs = gimple_get_lhs (stmt);
if (lhs)
{
- tree res = gimple_match_and_simplify (lhs, NULL, valueize);
+ tree res = gimple_simplify (lhs, NULL, valueize);
if (res)
{
if (dump_file && dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)
@@ -3721,7 +3730,7 @@ gimple_build (gimple_seq *seq, location_
enum tree_code code, tree type, tree op0,
tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
- tree res = gimple_match_and_simplify (code, type, op0, seq, valueize);
+ tree res = gimple_simplify (code, type, op0, seq, valueize);
if (!res)
{
res = make_ssa_name (type, NULL);
@@ -3751,7 +3760,7 @@ gimple_build (gimple_seq *seq, location_
enum tree_code code, tree type, tree op0, tree op1,
tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
- tree res = gimple_match_and_simplify (code, type, op0, op1, seq, valueize);
+ tree res = gimple_simplify (code, type, op0, op1, seq, valueize);
if (!res)
{
res = make_ssa_name (type, NULL);
@@ -3774,8 +3783,8 @@ gimple_build (gimple_seq *seq, location_
enum tree_code code, tree type, tree op0, tree op1, tree op2,
tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
- tree res = gimple_match_and_simplify (code, type, op0, op1, op2,
- seq, valueize);
+ tree res = gimple_simplify (code, type, op0, op1, op2,
+ seq, valueize);
if (!res)
{
res = make_ssa_name (type, NULL);
@@ -3804,7 +3813,7 @@ gimple_build (gimple_seq *seq, location_
enum built_in_function fn, tree type, tree arg0,
tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
- tree res = gimple_match_and_simplify (fn, type, arg0, seq, valueize);
+ tree res = gimple_simplify (fn, type, arg0, seq, valueize);
if (!res)
{
res = make_ssa_name (type, NULL);
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/gimple-fold.h (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.h (working copy)
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ extern tree get_symbol_constant_value (t
extern void gimplify_and_update_call_from_tree (gimple_stmt_iterator *, tree);
extern tree gimple_fold_builtin (gimple);
extern bool fold_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *);
+extern bool fold_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *, tree (*) (tree));
extern bool fold_stmt_inplace (gimple_stmt_iterator *);
extern tree maybe_fold_and_comparisons (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
enum tree_code, tree, tree);
@@ -108,17 +109,17 @@ gimple_convert (gimple_seq *seq, tree ty
in the sequence. */
/* In gimple-match.c. */
-tree gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
- gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
-tree gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree,
- gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
-tree gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree, tree,
- gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
-tree gimple_match_and_simplify (enum built_in_function, tree, tree,
- gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
+tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
+ gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
+tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree,
+ gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
+tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree, tree, tree,
+ gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
+tree gimple_simplify (enum built_in_function, tree, tree,
+ gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
/* The following two APIs are an artifact and should vanish in favor
of the existing gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant and fold_stmt APIs. */
-tree gimple_match_and_simplify (tree, gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
-bool gimple_match_and_simplify (gimple_stmt_iterator *, tree (*)(tree));
+tree gimple_simplify (tree, gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
+bool gimple_simplify (gimple_stmt_iterator *, tree (*)(tree));
#endif /* GCC_GIMPLE_FOLD_H */
Index: gcc/gimple-match-head.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/gimple-match-head.c (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/gimple-match-head.c (working copy)
@@ -63,15 +63,15 @@ private:
/* Forward declarations of the private auto-generated matchers.
They expect valueized operands in canonical order and do not
perform simplification of all-constant operands. */
-static bool gimple_match_and_simplify (code_helper *, tree *,
- gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree),
- code_helper, tree, tree);
-static bool gimple_match_and_simplify (code_helper *, tree *,
- gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree),
- code_helper, tree, tree, tree);
-static bool gimple_match_and_simplify (code_helper *, tree *,
- gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree),
- code_helper, tree, tree, tree, tree);
+static bool gimple_simplify (code_helper *, tree *,
+ gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree),
+ code_helper, tree, tree);
+static bool gimple_simplify (code_helper *, tree *,
+ gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree),
+ code_helper, tree, tree, tree);
+static bool gimple_simplify (code_helper *, tree *,
+ gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree),
+ code_helper, tree, tree, tree, tree);
/* Return whether T is a constant that we'll dispatch to fold to
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ constant_for_folding (tree t)
/* Helper that matches and simplifies the toplevel result from
- a gimple_match_and_simplify run (where we don't want to build
+ a gimple_simplify run (where we don't want to build
a stmt in case it's used in in-place folding). Replaces
*RES_CODE and *RES_OPS with a simplified and/or canonicalized
result and returns whether any change was made. */
@@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ gimple_resimplify1 (gimple_seq *seq,
code_helper res_code2;
tree res_ops2[3] = {};
- if (gimple_match_and_simplify (&res_code2, res_ops2, seq, valueize,
- *res_code, type, res_ops[0]))
+ if (gimple_simplify (&res_code2, res_ops2, seq, valueize,
+ *res_code, type, res_ops[0]))
{
*res_code = res_code2;
res_ops[0] = res_ops2[0];
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ gimple_resimplify1 (gimple_seq *seq,
}
/* Helper that matches and simplifies the toplevel result from
- a gimple_match_and_simplify run (where we don't want to build
+ a gimple_simplify run (where we don't want to build
a stmt in case it's used in in-place folding). Replaces
*RES_CODE and *RES_OPS with a simplified and/or canonicalized
result and returns whether any change was made. */
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ gimple_resimplify2 (gimple_seq *seq,
code_helper res_code2;
tree res_ops2[3] = {};
- if (gimple_match_and_simplify (&res_code2, res_ops2, seq, valueize,
- *res_code, type, res_ops[0], res_ops[1]))
+ if (gimple_simplify (&res_code2, res_ops2, seq, valueize,
+ *res_code, type, res_ops[0], res_ops[1]))
{
*res_code = res_code2;
res_ops[0] = res_ops2[0];
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ gimple_resimplify2 (gimple_seq *seq,
}
/* Helper that matches and simplifies the toplevel result from
- a gimple_match_and_simplify run (where we don't want to build
+ a gimple_simplify run (where we don't want to build
a stmt in case it's used in in-place folding). Replaces
*RES_CODE and *RES_OPS with a simplified and/or canonicalized
result and returns whether any change was made. */
@@ -269,9 +269,9 @@ gimple_resimplify3 (gimple_seq *seq,
code_helper res_code2;
tree res_ops2[3] = {};
- if (gimple_match_and_simplify (&res_code2, res_ops2, seq, valueize,
- *res_code, type,
- res_ops[0], res_ops[1], res_ops[2]))
+ if (gimple_simplify (&res_code2, res_ops2, seq, valueize,
+ *res_code, type,
+ res_ops[0], res_ops[1], res_ops[2]))
{
*res_code = res_code2;
res_ops[0] = res_ops2[0];
@@ -329,9 +329,9 @@ maybe_push_res_to_seq (code_helper rcode
}
tree
-gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code code, tree type,
- tree op0,
- gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
+gimple_simplify (enum tree_code code, tree type,
+ tree op0,
+ gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
if (constant_for_folding (op0))
{
@@ -343,14 +343,14 @@ gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_cod
code_helper rcode;
tree ops[3] = {};
- if (!gimple_match_and_simplify (&rcode, ops, seq, valueize,
- code, type, op0))
+ if (!gimple_simplify (&rcode, ops, seq, valueize,
+ code, type, op0))
return NULL_TREE;
return maybe_push_res_to_seq (rcode, type, ops, seq);
}
tree
-gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code code, tree type,
+gimple_simplify (enum tree_code code, tree type,
tree op0, tree op1,
gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
@@ -374,16 +374,16 @@ gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_cod
code_helper rcode;
tree ops[3] = {};
- if (!gimple_match_and_simplify (&rcode, ops, seq, valueize,
- code, type, op0, op1))
+ if (!gimple_simplify (&rcode, ops, seq, valueize,
+ code, type, op0, op1))
return NULL_TREE;
return maybe_push_res_to_seq (rcode, type, ops, seq);
}
tree
-gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_code code, tree type,
- tree op0, tree op1, tree op2,
- gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
+gimple_simplify (enum tree_code code, tree type,
+ tree op0, tree op1, tree op2,
+ gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
if (constant_for_folding (op0) && constant_for_folding (op1)
&& constant_for_folding (op2))
@@ -406,14 +406,14 @@ gimple_match_and_simplify (enum tree_cod
code_helper rcode;
tree ops[3] = {};
- if (!gimple_match_and_simplify (&rcode, ops, seq, valueize,
- code, type, op0, op1, op2))
+ if (!gimple_simplify (&rcode, ops, seq, valueize,
+ code, type, op0, op1, op2))
return NULL_TREE;
return maybe_push_res_to_seq (rcode, type, ops, seq);
}
tree
-gimple_match_and_simplify (enum built_in_function fn, tree type,
+gimple_simplify (enum built_in_function fn, tree type,
tree arg0,
gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
@@ -436,16 +436,16 @@ gimple_match_and_simplify (enum built_in
code_helper rcode;
tree ops[3] = {};
- if (!gimple_match_and_simplify (&rcode, ops, seq, valueize,
- fn, type, arg0))
+ if (!gimple_simplify (&rcode, ops, seq, valueize,
+ fn, type, arg0))
return NULL_TREE;
return maybe_push_res_to_seq (rcode, type, ops, seq);
}
static bool
-gimple_match_and_simplify (gimple stmt,
- code_helper *rcode, tree *ops,
- gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
+gimple_simplify (gimple stmt,
+ code_helper *rcode, tree *ops,
+ gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
if (is_gimple_assign (stmt))
{
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ gimple_match_and_simplify (gimple stmt,
SEQ) or NULL_TREE if no simplification was possible. */
tree
-gimple_match_and_simplify (tree name, gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
+gimple_simplify (tree name, gimple_seq *seq, tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
if (TREE_CODE (name) != SSA_NAME)
return NULL_TREE;
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ gimple_match_and_simplify (tree name, gi
code_helper rcode;
tree ops[3] = {};
- if (!gimple_match_and_simplify (stmt, &rcode, ops, seq, valueize))
+ if (!gimple_simplify (stmt, &rcode, ops, seq, valueize))
return NULL_TREE;
return maybe_push_res_to_seq (rcode, TREE_TYPE (name), ops, seq);
}
@@ -671,13 +671,13 @@ gimple_match_and_simplify (tree name, gi
sequence. */
bool
-gimple_match_and_simplify (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree (*valueize)(tree))
+gimple_simplify (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree (*valueize)(tree))
{
gimple stmt = gsi_stmt (*gsi);
gimple_seq seq = NULL;
code_helper rcode;
tree ops[3] = {};
- if (!gimple_match_and_simplify (stmt, &rcode, ops, &seq, valueize))
+ if (!gimple_simplify (stmt, &rcode, ops, &seq, valueize))
return false;
if (is_gimple_assign (stmt)
Index: gcc/match-bitwise.pd
===================================================================
--- gcc/match-bitwise.pd (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/match-bitwise.pd (working copy)
@@ -37,66 +37,66 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
*/
/* x & x -> x */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and integral_op_p@0 @0)
@0)
/* x & ~x -> 0 */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and:c integral_op_p@0 (bit_not @0))
{ build_int_cst (type, 0); })
/* ~x & ~y -> ~(x | y) */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and (bit_not integral_op_p@0) (bit_not @1))
(bit_not (bit_ior @0 @1)))
/* ~x | ~y -> ~(x & y) */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_ior (bit_not integral_op_p@0) (bit_not @1))
(bit_not (bit_and @0 @1)))
/* x & (~x | y) -> y & x */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and:c integral_op_p@0 (bit_ior:c (bit_not @0) @1))
(bit_and @1 @0))
/* (x | CST1) & CST2 -> (x & CST2) | (CST1 & CST2) */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and (bit_ior integral_op_p@0 INTEGER_CST_P@1) INTEGER_CST_P@2)
(bit_ior (bit_and @0 @2) (bit_and @1 @2)))
/* x ^ ~0 -> ~x */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_xor @0 integer_all_onesp@1)
(bit_not @0))
/* (x | y) & x -> x */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and:c (bit_ior integral_op_p@0 @1) @0)
@0)
/* (x & y) | x -> x */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_ior:c (bit_and integral_op_p@0 @1) @0)
@0)
/* (~x | y) & x -> x & y */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and:c (bit_ior:c (bit_not integral_op_p@0) @1) @0)
(bit_and @0 @1))
/* (~x & y) | x -> x | y */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_ior:c (bit_and:c (bit_not integral_op_p@0) @1) @0)
(bit_ior @0 @1))
/* ~~x -> x */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_not (bit_not integral_op_p@0))
@0)
/* ((a & b) & ~a) -> 0 */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and:c (bit_and integral_op_p@0 @1) (bit_not @0))
{ build_int_cst (type, 0); })
Index: gcc/match-builtin.pd
===================================================================
--- gcc/match-builtin.pd (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/match-builtin.pd (working copy)
@@ -19,22 +19,22 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
/* One builtin function to atom. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(BUILT_IN_SQRT (mult @0 @0))
@0)
/* One builtin function to builtin function. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(BUILT_IN_CABS (complex:c @0 real_zerop))
(BUILT_IN_FABS @0))
/* One builtin function to expr. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(BUILT_IN_CABS (complex @0 @0))
(mult (BUILT_IN_FABS @0) { build_real (TREE_TYPE (@0), real_value_truncate (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (@0)), dconst_sqrt2 ())); }))
/* One nested fn. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(mult:c (BUILT_IN_POW @0 @1) @0)
(BUILT_IN_POW @0 (PLUS_EXPR @1 { build_one_cst (TREE_TYPE (@1)); })))
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(BUILT_IN_POW @0 REAL_CST_P@1)
/* This needs to be conditionalized on flag_unsafe_math_optimizations,
but we keep it for now to exercise function re-optimization.
Index: gcc/match-constant-folding.pd
===================================================================
--- gcc/match-constant-folding.pd (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/match-constant-folding.pd (working copy)
@@ -18,48 +18,48 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
(for op in plus pointer_plus minus bit_ior bit_xor
- (match_and_simplify
+ (simplify
(op @0 integer_zerop)
@0))
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(minus @0 @0)
{ build_zero_cst (type); })
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(mult @0 integer_zerop@1)
@1)
/* Make sure to preserve divisions by zero. This is the reason why
we don't simplify x / x to 1 or 0 / x to 0. */
(for op in mult trunc_div ceil_div floor_div round_div
- (match_and_simplify
+ (simplify
(op @0 integer_onep)
@0))
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(trunc_mod @0 integer_onep)
{ build_zero_cst (type); })
/* Same applies to modulo operations, but fold is inconsistent here
and simplifies 0 % x to 0. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(trunc_mod integer_zerop@0 @1)
(if (!integer_zerop (@1)))
@0)
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_ior @0 integer_all_onesp@1)
@1)
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and @0 integer_all_onesp)
@0)
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and @0 integer_zerop@1)
@1)
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_xor @0 @0)
{ build_zero_cst (type); })
Index: gcc/match-plusminus.pd
===================================================================
--- gcc/match-plusminus.pd (revision 213626)
+++ gcc/match-plusminus.pd (working copy)
@@ -17,15 +17,15 @@ You should have received a copy of the G
along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
-/* ??? Have match_and_simplify groups guarded with common
+/* ??? Have simplify groups guarded with common
predicates on the outermost type? */
/* Contract negates. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(plus:c @0 (negate @1))
(if (!TYPE_SATURATING (type)))
(minus @0 @1))
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(minus @0 (negate @1))
(if (!TYPE_SATURATING (type)))
(plus @0 @1))
@@ -39,35 +39,35 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
(if (!TYPE_SATURATING (type)
&& !FLOAT_TYPE_P (type) && !FIXED_POINT_TYPE_P (type))
- (match_and_simplify
+ (simplify
(minus (plus @0 @1) @0)
@1)
- (match_and_simplify
+ (simplify
(minus (minus @0 @1) @0)
(negate @1))
- (match_and_simplify
+ (simplify
(minus (plus @0 @1) @1)
@0)
- (match_and_simplify
+ (simplify
(plus:c (minus @0 @1) @1)
@0))
/* (CST +- A) +- CST -> CST' +- A. */
-/* match_and_simplify handles constant folding for us so we can
+/* simplify handles constant folding for us so we can
implement these as re-association patterns.
Watch out for operand order and constant canonicalization
we do! A - CST -> A + -CST, CST + A -> A + CST. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(plus (plus @0 INTEGER_CST_P@1) INTEGER_CST_P@2)
/* If the constant operation overflows we cannot do the transform
as we would introduce undefined overflow, for example
with (a - 1) + INT_MIN. */
(if (!TREE_OVERFLOW (@1 = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, @1, @2))))
(plus @0 @1))
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(plus (minus INTEGER_CST_P@0 @1) INTEGER_CST_P@2)
(minus (plus @0 @2) @1))
/* TODO:
@@ -83,35 +83,35 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
*/
/* ~A + A -> -1 */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(plus:c (bit_not @0) @0)
{ build_all_ones_cst (type); })
/* ~A + 1 -> -A */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(plus (bit_not integral_op_p@0) integer_onep)
(negate @0))
/* A - (A +- B) -> -+ B */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(minus @0 (plus:c @0 @1))
(negate @1))
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(minus @0 (minus @0 @1))
@1)
/* (T)(P + A) - (T)P -> (T) A */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(minus (convert (pointer_plus @0 @1))
(convert @0))
(convert @1))
/* associate_pointerplus: (ptr p+ off1) p+ off2 -> ptr p+ (off1 + off2) */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(pointer_plus (pointer_plus @0 @1) @3)
(pointer_plus @0 (plus @1 @3)))
/* associate_pointerplus_diff: ptr1 p+ (ptr2 - ptr1) -> ptr2 */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(pointer_plus @0 (convert (minus (convert @1) (convert @0))))
@1)
Index: gcc/match-rotate.pd
===================================================================
--- gcc/match-rotate.pd (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/match-rotate.pd (working copy)
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
/* (x << CNT1) OP (x >> CNT2) -> x r<< CNT1 OP being +, |, ^ */
(for op in plus bit_ior bit_xor
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(op:c (lshift @0 INTEGER_CST_P@1) (rshift @0 INTEGER_CST_P@2))
(if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
&& TYPE_PRECISION (type) == GET_MODE_PRECISION (TYPE_MODE (type))
Index: gcc/match.pd
===================================================================
--- gcc/match.pd (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/match.pd (working copy)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
expansion which folds a POINTER_PLUS_EXPR and doesn't expect
an ADDR_EXPR in return. */
#if GIMPLE
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(pointer_plus (addr@2 @0) INTEGER_CST_P@1)
(if (is_gimple_min_invariant (@2)))
{
@@ -64,26 +64,26 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
Fold (X << C1) & C2 into (X << C1) & (C2 | ((1 << C1) - 1))
(X >> C1) & C2 into (X >> C1) & (C2 | ~((type) -1 >> C1))
if the new mask might be further optimized. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(bit_and (rshift@0 @1 INTEGER_CST_P@2) integer_onep)
(if (compare_tree_int (@2, TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@1)) - 1) == 0))
@0)
/* COMPLEX_EXPR and REALPART/IMAGPART_EXPR cancellations. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(complex (realpart @0) (imagpart @0))
@0)
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(realpart (complex @0 @1))
@0)
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(imagpart (complex @0 @1))
@1)
/* One unary pattern. */
/* fold_negate_exprs convert - (~A) to A + 1. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(negate (bit_not integral_op_p@0))
(plus @0 { build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0), 1); } ))
@@ -91,13 +91,13 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
/* Due to COND_EXPRs weirdness in GIMPLE the following won't work
without some hacks in the code generator. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(cond (bit_not @0) @1 @2)
(cond @0 @2 @1))
/* match-and-simplify handles constant folding so we
can just do the decomposition here. */
-(match_and_simplify
+(simplify
(fma INTEGER_CST_P@0 INTEGER_CST_P@1 @3)
(plus (mult @0 @1) @3))
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-1.c (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-1.c (working copy)
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ double test1 (_Complex double z)
return __builtin_cabs (z);
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to \[^\n\r\]*fabs" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to \[^\n\r\]*fabs" "forwprop1" } } */
double test2 (double x)
{
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ double test2 (double x)
return __builtin_cabs (z);
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to \[^\n\r\]*= _\\d\+ \\* 1.41" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to \[^\n\r\]*= _\\d\+ \\* 1.41" "forwprop1" } } */
double test3 (double x)
{
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ double test3 (double x)
return y * x;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to \[^\n\r\]*pow \\(x_\\d\+\\(D\\), 6" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to \[^\n\r\]*pow \\(x_\\d\+\\(D\\), 6" "forwprop1" } } */
double test4 (double w)
{
@@ -33,6 +33,6 @@ double test4 (double w)
return y * x;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to \[^\n\r\]*= w_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to \[^\n\r\]*= w_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "forwprop1" } } */
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-bitwise.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-bitwise.c (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-bitwise.c (working copy)
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ int bitwise_1(int x)
int bitwise_1_val = t1 & x;
return bitwise_1_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to bitwise_1_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to bitwise_1_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* x & ~x -> 0 */
int bitwise_2(int x)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int bitwise_2(int x)
int bitwise_2_val = t1 & x;
return bitwise_2_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to bitwise_2_val_\\d\+ = 0" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to bitwise_2_val_\\d\+ = 0" "forwprop1" } } */
/* x ^ x -> 0 */
int bitwise_3(int x)
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ int bitwise_3(int x)
int bitwise_3_val = t1 ^ x;
return bitwise_3_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to bitwise_3_val_\\d\+ = 0" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to bitwise_3_val_\\d\+ = 0" "forwprop1" } } */
/* ~~x -> 0 */
int bitwise_4(int x)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int bitwise_4(int x)
int bitwise_4_val = ~t1;
return bitwise_4_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to bitwise_4_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to bitwise_4_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (x | y) & x -> x */
int bitwise_5(int x, int y)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ int bitwise_5(int x, int y)
int bitwise_5_val = t1 & x;
return bitwise_5_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to bitwise_5_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to bitwise_5_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (x & y) | x -> x */
int bitwise_6(int x, int y)
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ int bitwise_6(int x, int y)
int bitwise_6_val = t1 | x;
return bitwise_6_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to bitwise_6_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to bitwise_6_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (~x & y) | x -> x | y */
int bitwise_7(int x, int y)
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ int bitwise_7(int x, int y)
int bitwise_7_val = t2 | x;
return bitwise_7_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to bitwise_7_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) | y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to bitwise_7_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) | y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (~x | y) & x -> x & y */
int bitwise_8(int x, int y)
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int bitwise_8(int x, int y)
int bitwise_8_val = t2 & x;
return bitwise_8_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to bitwise_8_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) & y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to bitwise_8_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) & y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* ((x & y) & ~x) & ~y -> 0 */
int bitwise_9(int x, int y)
@@ -83,6 +83,6 @@ int bitwise_9(int x, int y)
int bitwise_9_val = t1 & t2;
return bitwise_9_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to bitwise_9_val_\\d\+ = 0" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to bitwise_9_val_\\d\+ = 0" "forwprop1" } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "forwprop2" } } */
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-plusminus.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-plusminus.c (revision 213626)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-plusminus.c (working copy)
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ int plusminus_1(int x, int y)
int plusminus_1_val = x + t1;
return plusminus_1_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to plusminus_1_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) - y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to plusminus_1_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) - y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* x - (-y) -> y + x */
int plusminus_2(int x, int y)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int plusminus_2(int x, int y)
int plusminus_2_val = x - t1;
return plusminus_2_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to plusminus_2_val_\\d\+ = y_\\d\+\\(D\\) \\+ x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to plusminus_2_val_\\d\+ = y_\\d\+\\(D\\) \\+ x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (x + y) - x -> y */
int plusminus_3(int x, int y)
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ int plusminus_3(int x, int y)
int plusminus_3_val = t1 - x;
return plusminus_3_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to plusminus_3_val_\\d\+ = y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to plusminus_3_val_\\d\+ = y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (x - y) - x -> -y */
int plusminus_4(int x, int y)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int plusminus_4(int x, int y)
int plusminus_4_val = t1 - x;
return plusminus_4_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to plusminus_4_val_\\d\+ = -y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to plusminus_4_val_\\d\+ = -y_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (x + y) - y -> x */
int plusminus_5(int x, int y)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ int plusminus_5(int x, int y)
int plusminus_5_val = t1 - y;
return plusminus_5_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to plusminus_5_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to plusminus_5_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (x - y) + y -> x */
int plusminus_6(int x, int y)
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ int plusminus_6(int x, int y)
int plusminus_6_val = t1 + y;
return plusminus_6_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to plusminus_6_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to plusminus_6_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (x + cst1) + cst2 -> x + (cst1 + cst2) */
int plusminus_7(int x)
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int plusminus_7(int x)
int plusminus_7_val = t1 + 4;
return plusminus_7_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to plusminus_7_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) \\+ 7" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to plusminus_7_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) \\+ 7" "forwprop1" } } */
/* (cst1 - x) + cst2 -> (cst1 + cst2) - x */
int plusminus_8(int x)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int plusminus_8(int x)
int plusminus_8_val = t1 + 4;
return plusminus_8_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to plusminus_8_val_\\d\+ = 7 - x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to plusminus_8_val_\\d\+ = 7 - x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* ptr1 p+ (ptr2 - ptr1) -> ptr2 */
unsigned char *
@@ -81,6 +81,6 @@ plusminus_9(unsigned char *ptr1, unsigne
unsigned char *plusminus_9_val = ptr1 + t1;
return plusminus_9_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to plusminus_9_val_\\d\+ = ptr2" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to plusminus_9_val_\\d\+ = ptr2" "forwprop1" } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "forwprop2" } } */
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-realimag.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-realimag.c (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-realimag.c (working copy)
@@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ double realimag_1(double x)
double realimag_1_val = __real t1;
return realimag_1_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to realimag_1_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to realimag_1_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "forwprop2" } } */
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-rotate.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-rotate.c (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/match-rotate.c (working copy)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ rotate_1 (unsigned char x)
unsigned char rotate_1_val = t1 + t2;
return rotate_1_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to rotate_1_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) r<< 5" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to rotate_1_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) r<< 5" "forwprop1" } } */
unsigned char
rotate_2 (unsigned char x)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ rotate_2 (unsigned char x)
unsigned char rotate_2_val = t1 + t2;
return rotate_2_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "gimple_match_and_simplified to rotate_2_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) r<< 5" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "gimple_simplified to rotate_2_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) r<< 5" "forwprop1" } } */
unsigned char
rotate_3 (unsigned char x)
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ rotate_3 (unsigned char x)
unsigned char rotate_3_val = t1 | t2;
return rotate_3_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to rotate_3_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) r<< 5" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to rotate_3_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) r<< 5" "forwprop1" } } */
unsigned char
rotate_4 (unsigned char x)
@@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ rotate_4 (unsigned char x)
unsigned char rotate_4_val = t1 ^ t2;
return rotate_4_val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_match_and_simplified to rotate_4_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) r<< 5" "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to rotate_4_val_\\d\+ = x_\\d\+\\(D\\) r<< 5" "forwprop1" } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "forwprop1" } } */
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr52631.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr52631.c (revision 213544)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr52631.c (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-fre1-details" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-forwprop -fdump-tree-fre1-details" } */
unsigned f(unsigned a)
{
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c (revision 213574)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c (working copy)
@@ -3592,7 +3592,7 @@ simplify_mult (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi
static vec<tree> lattice;
-/* Primitive "lattice" function for gimple_match_and_simplify to discard
+/* Primitive "lattice" function for gimple_simplify to discard
matches on names whose definition contains abnormal SSA names. */
static tree
@@ -3664,15 +3664,16 @@ pass_forwprop::execute (function *fun)
{
gimple stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
- if (gimple_match_and_simplify (&gsi, fwprop_ssa_val))
+ if (fold_stmt (&gsi, fwprop_ssa_val))
{
stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
if (maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (stmt, stmt)
&& gimple_purge_dead_eh_edges (bb))
cfg_changed = true;
+ update_stmt (stmt);
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
{
- fprintf (dump_file, "gimple_match_and_simplified to ");
+ fprintf (dump_file, "gimple_simplified to ");
print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM);
}
}
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c (revision 213574)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c (working copy)
@@ -2866,8 +2866,8 @@ visit_reference_op_load (tree lhs, tree
of VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR <TREE_TYPE (result)> (result).
So first simplify and lookup this expression to see if it
is already available. */
- tree val = gimple_match_and_simplify (VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op),
- result, NULL, vn_valueize);
+ tree val = gimple_simplify (VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op),
+ result, NULL, vn_valueize);
if (!val)
val = vn_nary_op_lookup_pieces (1, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR,
TREE_TYPE (op), &result, NULL);
@@ -3084,6 +3084,7 @@ static tree
try_to_simplify (gimple stmt)
{
enum tree_code code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt);
+ tree tem;
/* For stores we can end up simplifying a SSA_NAME rhs. Just return
in this case, there is no point in doing extra work. */
@@ -3094,11 +3095,13 @@ try_to_simplify (gimple stmt)
??? Handle multiple stmts being generated by storing
at most one in VN_INFO->expr? But then we'd have to
transparently support materializing temporary SSA names
- created by gimple_match_and_simplify - or we never value-number
+ created by gimple_simplify - or we never value-number
to them. */
- if (TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt)) == SSA_NAME)
- return gimple_match_and_simplify (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt),
- NULL, vn_valueize);
+ tem = gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1 (stmt, vn_valueize);
+ if (tem
+ && (TREE_CODE (tem) == SSA_NAME
+ || is_gimple_min_invariant (tem)))
+ return tem;
return NULL_TREE;
}