This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Not very subtle fix for pr61510


> 
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:43:20PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > pr61510 is a case where cgraphunit.c::analyze_functions can end up
> > > > dereferencing a NULL pointer. This is, to me, the obvious way to avoid
> > > > dereferencing NULL.
> > > >
> > > > However, I'm not very confident that this isn't just masking some
> > > > horrible and subtle bug, so I'd like some review feedback on the patch.
> > > >
> > > > Tested on aarch64-none-elf, where I was seeing the issue.
> > > >
> > > > OK?
> > >
> > > Obvious in some sense to me, too, but I wonder why we don't have a cgraph
> > > node
> > > for it and what happens if it is created later (and then doesn't
> > > have the flag set)?
> >
> > In that case we won't get the used_as_abstract_origin flag. that will make us
> > to throw away the debug info if we remove it. I guess we simply want
> > graph_get_create_node here.  I can prepare patch tonight (after teaching)
> 
> I've spun a patch with what I think you were suggesting here.
> 
> Tested on aarch64-none-elf with no regressions to confirm it fixes the
> bug and bootstrapped on x86 and aarch64 with no issues.
> 
> OK?
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> 
> ---
> 2014-07-31  James Greenhalgh  <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
> 
> 	PR regression/61510
> 	* cgraphunit.c (analyze_functions): Use get_create rather than get
> 	for decls which are clones of abstract functions.

OK,
thanks

Honza


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]