This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GSoC] Addition of ISL AST generation to Graphite
- From: Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser dot es>
- To: Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Mircea Namolaru <mircea dot namolaru at inria dot fr>,Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>,kyrylo dot tkachov at arm dot com,Rainer Orth <ro at cebitec dot uni-bielefeld dot de>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 15:00:45 +0200
- Subject: Re: [GSoC] Addition of ISL AST generation to Graphite
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CABGF_gcisNL2R2vVd8A1KaG1gcgOUok0EekK=8PTtkxg_VHU5w at mail dot gmail dot com> <53A1E2B9 dot 3090205 at grosser dot es> <CAFk3UF9KO7Jodwno__0xpHcmG_Wij8Y6k3VZoRXreduryCtMgg at mail dot gmail dot com> <53A7F4F6 dot 6000707 at grosser dot es> <CABGF_gfQm8z_avKo15k1=B4CDkxUTVCqXSfv-hXYihHb=9MEAw at mail dot gmail dot com> <53A82B9A dot 5000104 at grosser dot es> <CABGF_gdNu1UF_yepWOZyJby_qCT8WthcZSi7c1DY+WVMgyJhtQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <yddbnt5i8lt dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <yddk37rk15p dot fsf at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <53C3B4AE dot 1010705 at arm dot com> <CABGF_gcHAKCbnQZL34WOY6eeHdUtwUHNKOmKfbe9kkeKbh_FGw at mail dot gmail dot com> <53C54A1E dot 3030604 at grosser dot es> <CAFiYyc3nNFBbfVKi12t5=pf4=NsxSQWMcP-vMsKUx1RkaXyuXw at mail dot gmail dot com> <53C649D3 dot 7010807 at grosser dot es> <CABGF_ge6Q8oba7jvFP9n+wc=9k0SqcD0y_OPscwKrB89LHyYnQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <53C66BC7 dot 3010506 at grosser dot es> <CABGF_gc+eBhJyVOea4i4Yj2UA0LSr7z72rOh-ZE7YhmCQaXryw at mail dot gmail dot com> <53C7DAF5 dot 7080305 at grosser dot es> <CABGF_gc+tHjkbOLhu1J13d7CRnZWy5d2=GoUZjLS7Qt_hAvXjw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On July 20, 2014 1:29:30 PM CEST, Roman Gareev <gareevroman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am not aware of any problems with isl 0.12 and would be surprised
>if such
>> problems exist. Are you?
>
>I'm not aware of them, too.
>
>> P.S: As Richard suggested, we may also want to forbid CLooG 0.17.
>
>I've attached the patch, which adds the requirement for ClooG 0.18.1.
>Is it fine for trunk?
Great. Yes, I think it's fine for trunk.
Tobias
>
>--
> Cheers, Roman Gareev.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.